Б. Г. Ребзуев. Трудовая мотивация: измерение и изменение. Учебно-методическое пособие. Спб.: Ано «ипп», 2006. – 160 с

Вид материалаУчебно-методическое пособие
American Psychologist, 37
Подобный материал:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9
American Psychologist, 37, 858-859.
  • Locke, E.A. (1982). Licencing. American Psychologist, 37, 239.
  • Locke, E.A., Cartledge, N., & Knerr, C.S. (1970). Studies of the relationship between satisfaction, goal setting, and perfomance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 135-158.
  • Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13, 29-39.
  • Locke, E.A., Shaw, K.N., Saari, L.M., & Latham, G.P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
  • Lord, P.G., Maher, K.J. (1990). Alternative information-processing models and their implications for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 15, 9-28.
  • Luthans, F., Kreitner, R. (1985). Organizational behavior motivation and beyond: an operant and social learning approach. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • McClelland, D.C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20, 321-333.
  • McClelland, D.C., Atkinson, J.W., Clark, R.A., & Lowell, E.I. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton.
  • McClelland, D.C., Winter, D.G. (1969). Motivating economic achievement. New York: Free Press.
  • McCormick, E.J., & Ilgen, D.R. (1985). Industrial and organizational psychology (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Mento, A.J., Locke, E.A., & Klein, H.J. (1992). Relationship of goal level to valence and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 395-405.
  • Mento, A.J., Steel, R.P., & Karren, R.J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52-83.
  • Miller, L.E., Grush, J.E. (1988). Improving predictions in expectancy theory research: Effects of personality, expectancies, and norms. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 107-122.
  • Mitchell, T.R. (1974). Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference, and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096-1112.
  • Mitchell, T.R. (1979). Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 243-281.
  • Mitchell, T.R., Beach, L.R. (1990). “… Do I love thee? Let me count …”: Toward an understanding of intuitive and automatic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 1-20.
  • Mowday, R.T. (1983). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In R.M. Steers, & L.W. Porter (Ed.) Motivation and behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Mowen, J., Middlemist, R., & Luther, D. (1981). Joint effects of assigned goal level and incentive structure on task performance: A laboratory study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 598-603.
  • Muchinsky, P.M. (1977). A comparison of within and across subject analyses of the expectancy valence model for predicting effort. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 154-158.
  • Parker, C. P; Baltes, B. B. & Christiansen, N. D. (1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial-ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 376-389.
  • Pritchard, R.D., Dunnett, M.D., & Jorgenson, D.O. (1972). Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 75-94.
  • Pritchard, R.D., Hollenback, J., & DeLeo, P.J. (1980). The effects of continuous and partial schedules of reinforcement on effort, performance, and satisfacton. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 336-353.
  • Pritchard, R.D., Leonard, D.W., VonBergen, C.W., & Kirk, R.J. (1976). The effects of of varying schedules of reinforcement on human task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 205-230.
  • Rubin, Z. & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 65-89.
  • Saari, L.M., Latham, G.P. (1982). Employee reactions to continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules involving a monetary incentive. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 506-508.
  • Scheer, L.K., Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J.E. (2003). Reactions to Perceived Inequity in U.S. and Dutch Interorganizational Relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 303-316.
  • Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E. (1998). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology:
    Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262 - 274.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1959). Cumulative record. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Smith, K.G., Locke, E.A., & Barry, D. (1990). Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: An experimental simulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 118-134.
  • Stahl, M.J., Harrell, A.M. (1981). Modeling effort decisions with behavioral decision theory: Toward an individual differences model of expectancy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 303-325.
  • Sweeney, P. D. & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 83-98.
  • Tubbs, M.E. (1986). Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 474-483.
  • Tubbs, M.E. (1993). Commitment as moderator of the goal-performance relation: A case for clearer construct definition. Journal of Applied Psychology,78, 86-97.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
  • Umstot, D.D., Bell, C.H., Jr., & Mitchell, T.R. (1976). Effects of job enrichment and task goals on satisfaction and productivity: Implications for job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 379-394.
  • Valenzi, E.R., & Andrews, I.R. (1971). Effect of hourly overpay and underpay inequity when tested with a new induction procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 22-27.
  • Van Erde, W., Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom`s expectancy models and work-related criteria: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 575-586.
  • Vance, R.J., & Colella, A. (1990). Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology,75, 68-76.
  • Vecchio, R.P. (1981). An individual-differences interpretation on the conflicting predictions generated by equity theory and expectancy theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 470-481.
  • Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
  • Wanous, J.P., Keon, T.L., & Latack, J.C. (1983). Expectancy theory and occupational/organizational choices: A review and test. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 66-86.
  • Wiener, Y. (1970). The effects of “task” and “ego-oriented” performance on 2 kinds of overcompensation inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 191-208.
  • Wofford, J.C., Goodwin, V.L., & Premack, S. (1992). Meta-analysis of the antecedents of personal goal level and of the antecedents and consequences of goal commitment. Journal of Management, 19, 857-874.
  • Wood, R.E., Mento, A.J., & Locke, E.A. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 416-425.
  • Wright, P.M., O`Leary-Kelly, A.M., Cortina, J.M., Klein, H.J., & Hollenbeck, J.R. (1994). On the meaning and measurement of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 795-803.
  • Yukl, G.A., Latham, G.P. (1975). Consequences of reinforcement schedules and incentive magnitudes for employee performance: problems encountered in an industry setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 294-298.
  • Yukl, G.A., Latham, G.P., & Parsell, E.D. (1976). The effectiveness of performance incentives under continuous and variable ratio schedules of reinforcement. Personnel Psychology, 29, 221-231.




    1 «Раны» – бейсбольный показатель, являющийся в какой-то степени аналогом количеству забитых мячей в европейском футболе. Как и в бейсболе, так и в футболе игроки оцениваются по целому набору игровых показателей, а не только по количеству забитых мячей, которое далеко не всегда играет решающую роль при оценке тренерами и специалистами общего уровня их спортивной квалификации.


    2 К сожалению, использовавшийся нами вопрос не подходит для оценки трудности целей. В отсутствие более надежной замены можем предложить измерять трудность целей просьбой оценить по 10-балльной шкале степень согласия с утверждением «Моя работа легкая». Это утверждение используется в упомянутом «Опроснике постановки целей».


    3 Авторы этого исследования отклонились от оригинального варианта Вроомовской модели. Они оценивали уровень ожиданий в отношении последствий, а не результата, как этого требует модель мотивации. Различного рода модификации моделей Вроома нередко встречаются в исследованиях.