И. Г. Гердер Познание самих себя, наше понятие о том, что значит быть человеком (как в качестве индивидов, так и в качестве членов группы), играет определенную роль в формировании нашего знания обо всем остальном
Вид материала | Документы |
СодержаниеThe Rules of Sociological Method |
- Лекция Тема: Группы и групповая динамика, 338.28kb.
- Сочинение 1 «Быть человеком это чувствовать вою ответственность». (А. Сент Экзюпери), 37.08kb.
- Опыт анализа цикла рассказов А. Яшина «Сладкий остров» (тезисы), 60.38kb.
- V. Социология знания, 682.89kb.
- Чтение и мышление, 40.37kb.
- Автоматизации, 768.88kb.
- Познание, 158.58kb.
- Познание познание мира, 152.27kb.
- Компьютерная программа как объект авторского права Андрей Белоусов Центр Исследования, 99.76kb.
- Ентация экономики на рыночные отношения коренным образом меняет подходы к решению многих, 22.84kb.
46 (1985): 363-79, p. 375.
xlii G. Rossini, ‘The Criticism of Rhetorical Historiography and the Ideal of Scientific Method: History, Nature and Science in the Political Language of Thomas Гоббс’, in Pagden (ed) (1987), p. 316.
xliii Гоббс (1991), pp. 11, 35.
xliv Ibid., p. 88
xlv Ibid., p. 110.
xlvi Ibid., p. 9.
xlvii Ibid., pp. 89-90.
xlviii S. Pufendorf, Of the Law of Nature and Nations. Eight Books, trans. B. Kennett (3rd edn, London: R. Sare etc., 1717), Vol.1, pp. 117, 137.
xlix Ibid., Vol. 2, p. 12.
l S. Pufendorf, On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, ed J. Tully (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 116.
li Ibid., pp. 120, 123.
lii Ibid., pp. 25-6.
liii Quoted in C. Taylor, Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), p. 35.
liv Quoted in M. H. Abrams, The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (London: Oxford University Press, 1953), p. 21.
lv B. Spinoza, The Ethics, in The Philosophy of Benedict de Spinoza, trans. R. H. M. Elwes (New York: Tudor Publishing, 1936), Part II, proposition vii.
lvi G. W. Leibniz, ‘Principles of Nature and of Grace’, in The Monadology and Other Philosophical Writings, trans. R. Latta (London: Oxford University Press, 1898), pp. 414-15.
lvii E. Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method, ed E. G. Catlin (reprint, New York: Free Press, 1966), pp. lvii-lviii.
lviii Ibid., p. 145.
lix Quoted in P. Abrams, ‘The Uses of British Sociology, 1831-1981’, in M. Bulmer (ed), Essays on the History of British Sociological Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 182.
lx A. Quetelet, A Treatise on Man and the Development of His Faculties (reprint, New York: Burt Franklin, 1968), p. 96.
lxi E. Lisle, quoted in I. Hacking, ‘How Numerical Sociology Began by Counting Suicides: From Medical Pathology to Social Pathology’, in I. B. Cohen (ed), The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences: Some Critical and Historical Perspectives (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1964), p. 118.
lxii Quetelet (1968), pp. 6, 96.
lxiii Цитируется по J. Cole, ‘The Chaos of Particular Facts: Statistics, Medicine and the Social Body in Early 19th-Century France, History of the Human Sciences, 7(3) (1994): 1-27, p. 1.
lxiv Цитируется поibid., p. 20.
lxv H. T. Buckle, History of Civilization in England (new edn, London: Longmans, Green, 1885), Vol. 1, p. 20.
lxvi Durkheim (1966), p. 110.
lxvii E. Durkheim, Suicide: A Study in Sociology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952), pp. 258, 248.
lxviii E. Durkheim, Sociology and Philosophy (London: Cohen & West, 1953), p. 55.
lxix Цитируется поG. Hawthorn, Enlightenment and Despair: A History of Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), pp. 118-19.
lxx E. Durkheim and M. Mauss, Primitive Classification (2nd edn, London: Cohen & West, 1969), pp. 8, 83.
lxxi R. Benedict, Patterns of Culture (reprint, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1935), p. 2.
lxxii Цитируется по L. A. Coser, Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Sociological and Historical Context (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971), p. 218.
lxxiii M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: Unwin, 1930), p. 181; I use the translation in W. J. Cahnman, [Review of A. Mitzman, The Iron Cage: An Historical Interpretation of Max Weber], Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14 (1978): 189-91, p. 189.
lxxiv Цитируется по D. Kasler, Max Weber: An Introduction to His Life and Work (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988), p. 180.
lxxv P. Lassman and I. Velody (eds), Max Weber’s ‘Science as a Vocation’ (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), p. 18.
lxxvi Ibid., pp. 14, 18.
lxxvii Ibid., p. 30.
lxxviii Weber (1930), p. 182, quoting Nietzsche.
lxxix Quoted in W. Outhwaite, Understanding Social Life: The Method Called ‘Verstehen’ (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1975), p. 47.
lxxx G. Simmel, ‘The Metropolis and Mental Life’, in On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings, ed D. N. Levine (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), pp. 325, 338.
lxxxi Quoted in D. Frisby, Georg Simmel (Chichester: Ellis Horwood, and London and New York: Tavistock, 1984), p. 48.
lxxxii G. Simmel, The Philosophy of Money (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978), p. 55.
lxxxiii Quoted in T. L. Haskell, The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977), pp. 204-5.
lxxxiv Quoted in ibid., p. 209.
lxxxv Quoted in H. Kuklick, ‘Boundary Maintenance in American Sociology: Limitations to Academic “Professionalization”’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16 (1980): 201-19, p. 205.
lxxxvi Quoted in Coser (1971), p. 520.
lxxxvii Quoted in Kuklick (1980), p. 206.
lxxxviii Quoted in Hawthorn (1976), p. 211.
lxxxix Quoted in Kuklick (1980), p. 208.