Образование в сибири

Вид материалаДокументы

Содержание


Conceptual bases of open educational space projection in countryside.
Continuous technological education as the basis of high-quality specialists’ training.
Interrelation of economic interests of scientific-innovation sphere subjects: problem setting.
The specific character of professional training of personnel at nuclear-dangerous enterprises: quality and effectiveness problem
Potential rating of higher education institutes: factors forming choice sets.
National and regional peculiarities of the differentiated education system.
Open education: modern requirements to the educator and graduate.
Theoretical approaches to the elaboration of the development process of teacher’ professionalism.
Educational exhibition as an organizational mechanism of educational production marketing management.
Bologna process, complex evaluation and quality management systems.
The role of funds in the development of youth’s positive attitude to nature.
Program and aim approach to training and retraining the educators.
Physical training in higher education institutions.
The analysis of effectiveness of humanistic bias in professional preparation of rehabilitating-prophylactic character at physica
The analysis of the demand and offer of pedagogical personnel in physical education and sports of tomsk region.
Social dysadaptation of homeless children and teenagers as a pedagogical problem.
European experience of cultural wealth inclusion into the content of education of state educational establishments.
The role of professional associations in the area of comparative and internationaledyucation: new challenges and opportunities f
Tradition, change and the role of the world council of comparative education societies.
Comparative and international education society (cies) facing the twenty-first century: challenges and contributions.
...
Полное содержание
Подобный материал:
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19

Объективная сложность процесса проектирования воспитательной работы в образовательном учреждении в современных условиях очевидна, но помимо этого также существуют субъективные проблемы, связанные с отсутствием развитых проектировочных умений как у зам. директоров по воспитательной работе, так и, в еще большей степени, у классных руководителей.

Наибольшую сложность по нашим данным вызывает процесс выбора идеи, затем – на ее основе - постановки комплекса целей и задач с учетом требований реалистичности, достижимости, конкретности, диагностичности; разработка критериальной базы для оценки эффективности проектируемой деятельности. Сложность у педагогов-воспитателей также вызывает расчленение деятельности по достижению целей на этапы, определение промежуточных результатов на каждом этапе.

С процессом проектирования по полноте современное образовательное учреждение сталкивается преимущественно при выходе на уровень инновационной деятельности. Далее все зависит от того, каков масштаб инновации: локальная, модульная, системная. Локальная инновация касается, как правило, небольшой группы педагогов, апробирующих или разрабатывающих некую идею в области воспитательной работы. Процесс проектирования в данном случае носит также локальный, «свернутый» характер. Он, как правило, не содержит большой аналитической базы, масштабных долгосрочных проектов, реализуется ситуативно, отслеживается по небольшому количеству показателей, чаще всего, 1-2 раза в год.

Модульная инновация требует включения в данную деятельность зам. директора по воспитательной работе. Роль, которую выполняет в данном случае зам. директора, зависит от того, кто является автором и носителем идеи – он сам, кто-то из педагогов, внешние (вышестоящие руководители или органы); есть ли в школе научный руководитель; отношение вышестоящих органов к реализации данной идеи.

При разном стечении указанных обстоятельств зам. директора по воспитательной работе может быть как инициатором, так заказчиком (со всеми вытекающими полномочиями) и исполнителем (как правило, ответственным), реализатором данной деятельности.

В любом случае данный тип инновации требует от зам. директора по воспитательной работе организовать следующие виды деятельности: проведение анализа воспитательной работы образовательного учреждения как целостной подсистемы; разработку на его основе программы развития воспитательной работы в школе (как правило, на несколько лет), включая критерии и показатели диагностики эффективности деятельности; определение прогнозируемых результатов для каждого этапа работы.

Системная же инновация однозначно предполагает включение в нее воспитательной деятельности в качестве одного из элементов. Следовательно, все виды аналитико-проектировочной деятельности, указанные выше, будут присутствовать, дополнительно появится необходимость согласования проекта воспитательной деятельности с проектами других подсистем.

Как спроектировать воспитательную систему, направленную, на реализацию той или иной философско-педагогической идеи? Как и любая деятельность, деятельность по проектированию системы воспитательной работы начинается с этапа самоопределения. На начальном этапе перед непосредственным проектированием воспитательной работы образовательного учреждения заместителю директора по воспитательной работе важно осуществить следующие действия: организовать самоопределение участников процесса проектирования на основе формирования их представлений по поводу разнообразных философско-педагогических идей, которые могут быть положены в основу проектирования воспитательного процесса; учесть традиции учреждения и особенности кадрового состава, преобладающие в коллективе ценностные ориентации; согласовать позиции участников процесса проектирования относительно предложенных философско-педагогических идей.

При разработке проекта зам. директора (совместно с научным руководителем) учитывает теоретические наработки в области проектировочной деятельности с тем, чтобы избежать уже известных ошибок проектирования, опираясь на имеющийся «банк» философско-педагогических идей.

По содержанию этот этап включает в себя анализ существующего состояния воспитательной работы и возможных путей изменения сложившейся ситуации. Анализ возможностей изменения осуществлялся на основе подбора философско-педагогических идей, соответствующих ценностным основаниям большей части педагогического коллектива.

Выбор идеи – это процесс достаточно непростой и продолжительный по времени, так как связан с прохождением ряда необходимых ступеней назовем их: аналитический этап; подготовительный (поисково-прогнозный) этап; этап разработки содержания программы (моделирующий); контрольно-коррекционный этап; этап оформление содержания программы; этап апробации программы и, наконец, этап внедрения наработок в деятельность всего учреждения на всех ступенях и по всем направлениям.

Наиболее адекватно на современном этапе обучение зам. директоров по воспитательной работе и других специалистов в области воспитательной работы учреждения вопросам проектирования происходит в системе повышения квалификации, где данные категории специалистов получают и знания, и первичный опыт такого проектирования, (в том числе – участвуя в разработке разнообразных городских проектов), консультации специалистов и внешнюю оценку результатов собственного проектирования.

На анализа деятельности в данном направлении, можно констатировать, что, во-первых, организация и осуществление процесса проектирования воспитательной деятельности учреждения является неотъемлемой и объективно необходимой в современных условиях составляющей управленческой деятельности зам. директора по воспитательной работе; во-вторых, наиболее адекватен современной педагогической парадигме инициативно-проблемный подход к проектированию воспитательного процесса образовательного учреждения; в-третьих, в управлении проектированием воспитательного процесса необходимо изучать и учитывать ценностные ориентации участвующих в проектировании педагогов, а при внедрении и апробации проекта – и всего коллектива.

Литература.
  1. Гершунский Б.С. Философия образования для XXI века: В поисках практико ориентированных образовательных концепций. – М.: Изд-во «Совершенство», 1998. – 608 с. - С.126.
  2. Габдулхаков Р.Р. Аксиологические императивы образования. – Уфа, 1999. – 86 с.
  3. Беляева Л.А. Философия воспитания. – М.,1996. – С.61.

SUMMARY


Kurovsky V.N. CONCEPTUAL BASES OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL SPACE PROJECTION IN COUNTRYSIDE. The extrapolation of the education into all spheres of economy and life of the society for securing the steady social and natural evolution is the leading idea of the educational development. In this respect the educational process from the viewpoint of philosophy of education is a complex syntactical category in which we can observe all functioning systems and the development of the educational system in global educational detention. According to the presented theory the author treats the topical milieu as a part of the external milieu; the notion “pedagogical culture”, projection as means for the solution how to get over the modern social and cultural disintegration (gap in cultural and social mechanisms of society development and reproduction.

Kopytov A.D., Paliyanov M.P., Fedko V.T., Dolgun B.N. CONTINUOUS TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION AS THE BASIS OF HIGH-QUALITY SPECIALISTS’ TRAINING. Nowadays the technology phenomenon is a part of the culture of the society. Therefore the problem of correspondence of the technological education to the demands of time and society is the actual problem in the educational milieu. The authors of the article are convinced that polytechnic education and technological training enables to fully realise the formation process of the personality at continuous changing information milieu. Meanwhile the logics of technological training is understood as creative thinking development on the base of formation of the whole technological image of the world, where man is the system forming centre.

Sizov V.V. INTERRELATION OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS OF SCIENTIFIC-INNOVATION SPHERE SUBJECTS: PROBLEM SETTING. The article considers the problems of formation of scientific-innovation sphere, the peculiarity of economic interests of its subject and also the problems of mechanism formation of interrelation of interests of scientific-innovation sphere subjects.

Shishkovsky V.I., Petlin V.I. THE SPECIFIC CHARACTER OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF PERSONNEL AT NUCLEAR-DANGEROUS ENTERPRISES: QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS PROBLEMS OF COMPANY’S STAFF TRAINING. In the article the authors present a system of viewpoints on the content, organisation forms, means and methods of professional development and retraining of the personnel in the process of innovation development search of that system. In the perspective of the given problem the authors pay special attention to the quality management system, which is outlined among other existing management systems, since it is one of the latest achievements when solving the problem of product quality of any establishment and educational one as well.

Ivankina L.I. POTENTIAL RATING OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTES: FACTORS FORMING CHOICE SETS. The author treats and analyses the preferences and intentions of the choice for professional education by the potential customers of the education offered by Tomsk universities. The author also treats education as one of the important channels and mechanisms of social structure, mobility and status positioning, making the education claimed by the potential customers.

The importance of the dynamics research of the arrangement and expectation change becomes necessary in modern conditions for creating communicative strategies and establishing the perspectives of the development.

Temerbekova A.A., Dmitrienko V.A. NATIONAL AND REGIONAL PECULIARITIES OF THE DIFFERENTIATED EDUCATION SYSTEM. Modernization of the contemporary Russian education is connected with the serious reassessment of the approaches towards the content and organization of education, definition of quality criteria, search for effective educational technologies with the use of foreign experience of educational systems but preserving its national and cultural basis. Creation of the united cultural-educational space, presented in the material, is treated as the effective activity for transformation of the education into the sphere of priority spheres of the development of the society in the frame of particular educational programmes of stabilisation and development.

Cherepanova T.B. OPEN EDUCATION: MODERN REQUIREMENTS TO THE EDUCATOR AND GRADUATE. Successful functioning of the society is becoming more dependant upon the effectiveness of the educational systems, upon the specialist professionalism of different professions and qualification. In the article the author deals with matrix demands for the educator and the graduate, which are required at the modern stage of society development.


Vtorina E.V. THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE ELABORATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF TEACHER’ PROFESSIONALISM. When analysing the motivation problem of professional and personal development, the author suggests theoretical approach towards working out the process of the professional pedagogical development. On the base of the used typological marking of the professional pedagogical level, the author singes out and characterises diagnostic features of the three components for professional pedagogical competence.

Tantsev A.A. EDUCATIONAL EXHIBITION AS AN ORGANIZATIONAL MECHANISM OF EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTION MARKETING MANAGEMENT. At present one needs alternative, multi aspect approaches towards Russian education. The author treats marketing activity in the educational management as it answers all modern demands in education.

Ukhanov L.I. BOLOGNA PROCESS, COMPLEX EVALUATION AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. The problem of quality of training is widely discussed both in Russia and in European academic community. The variety of understanding quality is vividly observed in the philosophy of the Bologna Declaration – declaration to form the united European educational community. The author analyses Russian educational situation and suggests different variant for solution of the modern education problems.

Anufriev S.I., Dugin A.V. THE ROLE OF FUNDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH’S POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO NATURE. The development of the modern information society leads to spread of the educational milieu. The frames of the educational establishment do not encourage creative activity among students and it does not enable to heighten their motivation to some particular subjects. On of the vivid examples of the solution of this problem is formation of the united ecological and educational milieu.

Schwabauer O.A. PROGRAM AND AIM APPROACH TO TRAINING AND RETRAINING THE EDUCATORS. The author treats the problem of securing of the high and professional level of the educator and his broad development on the base of systematic approach and taking into account both pedagogical and social and economic aspects. In the meantime the foreseeing and forecasting are treated as the hypothesis about the development trends and future state of the system on the whole and its particular components.

Borshchevsky A.A. PHYSICAL TRAINING IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. It becomes evident that a systematic approach towards dealing with the physical training culture phenomenon and its role in the humanitarian educational process. The methodology of the systematic analyses of the meaning of physical training foresees complete structure studying and also connections and functions of its structural components. Physical training is a complex complete system reflecting invariant features of cultural potential of some particular social group.

Peshkov V.F. THE ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF HUMANISTIC BIAS IN PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION OF REHABILITATING-PROPHYLACTIC CHARACTER AT PHYSICAL TRAINING FACULTY. On the base of the long-term experiment material, held at the Faculty of Physiacl Training of the TSPU, the authors present characteristics of the effectiveness of humanitarian approach to professional training. These results prove the effectiveness of the developed model of professional training of rehabilitation-prophylactic approach.

Peshkov V.F., Kopytov A.D. THE ANALYSIS OF THE DEMAND AND OFFER OF PEDAGOGICAL PERSONNEL IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS OF TOMSK REGION. On the base of statistic data, opinion pools of the personnel of physical training and sport and also questioning students, the author treats the problem of personnel engagement in Tomsk region. At that the quality is the main criterion of assessment of professional training and education and it is that what enables the professional establishments graduates to find a job, putting closer the demand and offer of pedagogical personnel.

Yashchuk A.V. SOCIAL DYSADAPTATION OF HOMELESS CHILDREN AND TEENAGERS AS A PEDAGOGICAL PROBLEM. Nowadays the social disorientation is a topical social problem. On the base of the analyses of the historic experience of solution of this problem, the authors demonstrate that the results of the social disorientation of the neglected children depends greatly on the positive decision of the entire complex problems set, connected first of all with the problems of normalization of social relations in the society, family, children collective, the level of cultural education, coordination of all concerned institutions and organisations.

Kostyukova T.A. EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE OF CULTURAL WEALTH INCLUSION INTO THE CONTENT OF EDUCATION OF STATE EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS. The source of traditional spiritual values of any national community is the religious background, as it is the most stable world vision value of the nation, peoples and separate individuals. Traditional spiritual value lies implicitly in the base of the world educational systems, providing them with stability, revealing their originality, cultural and world vision peculiarity. In the article the author presents the analysis of the foreign democratic countries experience in realisation of the rights to receive religious education and not contradicting the secular approach to education at the same time.

Kopytov A.D., Fedotova E.E., Cherepanova T.B. THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS IN THE AREA OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONALEDYUCATION: NEW CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR RUSSIA. The increased interest to the researches in the comparative and international education, typical of the great majority of countries can be explained by the tendencies of mutual dependence and influence of nation-states in the period of rapid development of globalization and integration process, including in social life and in education. At the same time the intensive integration makes actual the problem of preserving the unique, historically created peculiarities of educational systems. This should not contradict the objective necessity of assessment and international reciprocal recognition of qualification and certificate documents of all types.

Bray M. TRADITION, CHANGE AND THE ROLE OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF COMPARATIVE EDUCATION SOCIETIES. In the article the author briefly presents the characteristics of the World Council of comparative education societies, which was established in 1970, its members and tendencies of its development. The author considers that one of the most important activities of the Council is the organisation of congresses on comparative education, for example, 11th Congress held in the national Korean pedagogical university in Chungbuk and it was devoted to “New challenges, new paradigms: education at transfer stage to the 21st century”. Furthermore as the key problems are considered the continuous (traditional) tendencies and changes in comparative education (basic events, instruments for researches and communication, direction and topics of modern comparative pedagogical researches and choice of the analysis level). The author comes to the conclusion that the role of the global organization – World Council for conducting researches and information exchange in global comparative and international education is of great importance and has promising perspectives for the further development.

Arnove R. COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY (CIES) FACING THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: CHALLENGES AND CONTRIBUTIONS. The traditional address of the President of North American Society of Comparative and International Education is an original summing up of its work taking into consideration the changes in the world of the new century. It touches upon such important problems as analysis of the challenges of the modern comparative and international education and North American professional association and also upon the value of the comparative researchers and their opponents. The author makes conclusions that systematic, cross disciplinary character, cross national and cross cultural direction of the conducted researches in comparative and international education enables to reveal interconnection between global forces and potential of education for effective social changes. On that base the author singles out the existing tendencies in comparative education (internationalization, variety of new approaches etc.) All the aforementioned the author marks the priority tasks in comparative and international education and professional community.

Kotlyar V.N. COGNITIVE TRAVEL TO THE SECRETS OF WORKMANSHIP. Professional skills (and pedagogical in particular) improves when enlarging one’s interest in the subject and the result of personal professional activity. Professional teacher’s skills are treated as a high level of the pedagogical culture, as professional experience in its highest demonstration.

Morozov Evg. FORMATION OF PRIMARY EDUCATION IN TOMSK PROVINCE (until 1917). In the article the author deals with the sources of Russian education at the elementary education stage. Elementary education is treated from the position of historical value for the development of the educational system, multi factor analysis of this phenomenon is demonstrated.

Revyakina V.I., Sarycheva T.V. DEVELOPMENT OF PHYSICAL TRAINING MOVEMENT IN SIBERIA BY THE EXAMPLE OF TOMSK. The problem of physical training formation in Tomsk is treated from the viewpoint of historical and pedagogical analysis. The authors suggest period split of the physical training education. Moreover they are convinced that the working out of the long term conception of the public physical training and sports in universities should be based on the previous experience analysis.

Dmitrienko V.A., Galtsova N. P. THEORY OF EDUCATION INSTITUTE OF TSPU AS AN INNOVATION FORM OF PERSONNEL TRAINING OF HIGHER SCIENTIFIC QUALIFICATION. The integration of science and practice, high applied value of the scientific researches, intact organization of continuous training of the pedagogical personnel enable us to treat the Institute of the theory of education as the innovative structure of high professional education of Tomsk State Pedagogical University, possessing efficient level of personnel potential and open perspectives for further development and improvement.

Khutoryanskaya A.D. QUALITY MONITORING OF ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF MUNICIPAL SYSTEM OF EDUCATION. The quality of education is the main competitive advantage of any educational establishment. The author of the article is convinced that the education can be of a high level if one predicts those qualities of professional training, which educational establishments expect to receive in the form of the graduate, and the educational monitoring has professional improvement of the student’s competence with the aim of correspondence to the social and professional requirements.

Yadchenko E.M. INNOVATION APPROACHES TO CREATION AND REALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OF MULTIPLE-DISCIPLINE SECONDARY PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTION. At present one can observe the beginning of the formation of cultural upbringing with such peculiarities as pluralism in the approach of upbringing, increase of the role of psychological and pedagogical technologies, personal and active direction of the education and others.

The basic reference points of the assessment of the results of upbringing in educational establishments are factors of the students’ and graduates’ qualities necessary for the realization of personal civic rights and freedom, following the requirements of the society, state, fulfilling the duties of family members and work collective.

Griboedova T.P. TO THE PROBLEM OF PROJECTION OF EDUCATIONAL WORK IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION: METHODICAL-ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECT. Today practically every educational establishment is compelled to project upbringing activity. As the result of this process the author expects to see the concept which should be worked out in accordance with the traditions, specific peculiarities and conditions of the concrete establishment and also program of upbringing activity.


OUR AUTHORS

НАШИ АВТОРЫ

Anufriev Sergey Iosifovich, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Vice Director on Scientific Work, Research Institute for Educational Systems’ Development Russian Academy of Education

Arnove Robert F., Honorary Member of Northern-American Comparative and International Education Society (CIES), Chancellor’s Professor Emeritus, School of Education at the Indiana University (USA)

Borshchevsky Anatoly Alexandrovich, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Vice Rector of Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Bray Mark, President of the World Council of Comparative Education Societies, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Education at the University of Hong-Kong, China

Vtorina Elena Veniaminovna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Advanced Training and Staff Retraining, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Galtsova Natalia Petrovna, doctor of philology, vice director of the Institute of the Theory of Education of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University.

Griboedova Tatiyana Petrovna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Department Head of Theory and Methods of Educational Work, Advanced Training Institute, Novokuznetsk

Dmitrienko Valery Alexandrovich, Professor of Philosophy, Corresponding-Member of Russian Academy of Education, Director of Theory of Education, Tomsk State Pedagogical University


Dolgun Boris Grigorievich, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Vice Director of Yurga Technological Institute of Tomsk Polytechnic University

Dugin Alexey Vasilievich, Siberian State Industrial University, Novokuznetsk

Ivankina Lyubov Ivanovna, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Kopytov Anatoly Dmitrievich, Professor of Pedagogy, Director of Research Institute for Educational Systems’ Development Russian Academy of Education

Kostyukova Tatiyana Anatolievna, Professor of Pedagogy, Department Head of Professional Pedagogical Education of Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Laboratory Head of Research Institute for Educational Systems’ Development Russian Academy of Education

Kotlyar Victor Nikonovich, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Barnaul

Kurovsky Vasily Nikolaevich, Professor of Pedagogy, Laboratory Head of Research Institute for Educational Systems’ Development Russian Academy of Education

Morozov Evgeny, Priest, Vice Rector of Tomsk Theological Seminary

Paliyanov Mikhail Pavlovich, Professor of Education, Laboratory Head of Research Institute for Educational Systems’ Development Russian Academy of Education

Petlin Vladimir Iliych, Chief of Bureau for Staff Training of Tomsk Chemical Plant

Peshkov Vladimir Fedorovich, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department Head of Power National Kinds of Sports, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Revyakina Valentina Ivanovna, Professor of Pedagogy, Department Head of General Pedagogy, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Sarycheva Tatiana Valerievna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Department of Theoretical Principles of Physical Training, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Sizov Valery Vladimirovich, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Dean of Economics and Entrepreneurship Faculty of Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Tantsev Anatoly Alexandrovich, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Director of Technical and Economic Professional Lyceum № 11, Tomsk

Temerbekova Alibina Alexeevna, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Gorno-Altaysk State University

Ukhanov Leonid Ivanovich, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Vice Rector of Tomsk Economic and Juridical Institute

Fedotova Elena Evgenievna, Professor of Education, Director of the International Information Center, Tomsk State Pedagogical University


Fedko Valeriyan Timofeevich, Professor of Technical Sciences, Director of Yurga Technological Institute of Tomsk Polytechnic University

Khutoryanskaya A.D., Doctor of Philosophic Sciences, Vice Rector Advanced Training Institute, Novokuznetsk

Cherepanova Tamara Borisovna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Scientific Secretary of Research Institute for Educational Systems’ Development Russian Academy of Education

Schwabauer Olga Alexandrovna, Vice rector assistant of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Shishkovsky Victor Ivanovich, Professor of Physics and Mathematics, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Yadchenko Evgeny Mikhailovich, Vice Director of Blagoveshchensk Technological Secondary School

Yashchuk Alla Vladimirovna, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Ануфриев Сергей Иосифович, к.филос.н., профессор, зам.директора по научной работе Института развития образовательных систем РАО

Арнов Роберт, Почетный член Северо-Американской Ассоциации сравнительного и международного образования, Почетный профессор Школы Образования Университета шт.Индиана (США)

Борщевский Анатолий Александрович, к.пед.н., доцент, проректор Томского государственного педагогического университета

Брэй Марк, профессор, Президент Всемирного Совета обществ сравнительного образования, руководитель, декан Факультета образования Университета Гонконга

Вторина Елена Вениаминовна, к.пед.н., доцент, декан факультета повышения квалификации и переподготовки кадров ТГПУ

Гальцова Наталья Петровна, кандидат филологических наук, заместитель директора Института теории образования Томского государственного педагогического университета

Грибоедова Татьяна Петровна, к.пед.н., зав. кафедрой теории и методики воспитательной работы Института повышения квалификации, г. Новокузнецк

Дмитриенко Валерий Александрович, д.филос.н., профессор, член-корреспондент Российской академии образования, директор Института теории образования Томского государственного педагогического университета

Долгун Борис Григорьевич, к.тех.н., доцент, зам.директора Юргинского технологического института Томского политехнического университета

Дугин Алексей Васильевич, Сибирский государственный индустриальный университет, г.Новокузнецк

Иванкина Любовь Ивановна, к.ист.н., доцент, Томскийгосударственный педагогический университет

Копытов Анатолий Дмитриевич, д.пед.н., профессор, директор Института развития образовательных систем РАО

Костюкова Татьяна Анатольевна, д.пед.н., зав.кафедрой профессионального педагогического образования Томского государственного педагогического университета, зав.лабораторией Института развития образовательных систем РАО

Котляр Виктор Никонович, к.пед.н., г.Барнаул

Куровский Василий Николаевич, д.пед.н., зав.лабораторией Института развития образовательных систем РАО

Морозов Евгений, священник, проректор Томской Духовной семинарии

Пальянов Михаил Павлович, д.пед.н., зав.лабораторией Института развития образовательных систем РАО

Петлин Владимир Ильич, начальник Бюро подготовки кадров Сибирского химического комбината

Пешков Владимир Федорович, к.пед.н., доцент, зав.кафедрой силовых, национальных видов спорта и единоборств Томского государственного педагогического университета

Ревякина Валентина Ивановна, д.пед.н., профессор, зав.кафедрой общей педагогики Томского государственного педагогического университета

Сарычева Татьяна Валерьевна, к.пед.н., кафедра теоретических основ физического воспитания Томского государственного педагогического университета

Сизов Валерий Владимирович, к.экон.н., профессор, декан Факультета экономики и предпринимательства Томского государственного педагогического университета

Танцев Анатолий Александрович, к.пед.н., директор Технико-экономического профессионального лицея № 11 г. Томска

Темербекова Альбина Алексеевна, к.пед.н., доцент, Горно-Алтайский государственный университет

Уханов Леонид Иванович, к.технических н., проректор Томского экономико-юридического института

Федотова Елена Евгеньевна, д.пед.н., директор Международного информационного центра Томского государственного педагогического университета

Федько Валерьян Тимофеевич, д.тех.н., профессор, директор Юргинского технологического института Томского политехнического университета

Хуторянская А.Д., к.филол.н., проректор Института повышения квалификации, г. Новокузнецка


Черепанова Тамара Борисовна, к.пед.н., доцент, ученый секретарь Института развития образовательных систем РАО

Швабауэр Ольга Александровна, зам.проректора Томского государственного педагогического университета

Шишковский Виктор Иванович, д.физ-мат.н., профессор, Томский государственный педагогический университет

Ядченко Евгений Михайлович, заместитель директора Благовещенского технологического техникума

Ящук Алла Владимировна, Томский государственный педагогический университет




THE INFORMATION FOR READERS AND AUTHORS OF THE JOURNAL


The peer-review journal «Education in Siberia» includes the following sections: general problems of education; regional and national matters of education; educational and pedagogical innovations; from the history of education development; monuments of pedagogical thought; abroad experience and international cooperation in the field of education; scientific reports, projects, information.

The size of copies on general, regional, national and historical problems, educational and pedagogical innovations, international cooperation in the field of education – up to 0,5 printer’s sheet; for informational section – up to 0,2 printer’s sheet. Articles are taken in two copies. All the materials are printed in 1,5 interval. Bibliography is arranged in numeration order and put at the end of the text on a separate list. Materials should have electronic variant made in Word. The article should have two reviews: one of them from the organization, the other – by a specialist from another institution.

In addition to materials there should be presented the information about the author: surname, name, patronymic (in full), academic degree, academic status, work status, contact phone number and e-mail.

The manuscripts are not returned to authors.

Materials for the journal as well as requests for it you should send by mail to the address:


Contact information:

75, Komsomolsky Prospekt, Tomsk, 634041, Russia

Research Institute for Educational Systems’ Development of the Russian Academy of Education. Academic Secretary Cherepanova Tamara Borisovna.

Phone: (8-382-2) 52-29-43

Е-mail: tamarach@tspu.edu.ru


К СВЕДЕНИЮ АВТОРОВ

И ЧИТАТЕЛЕЙ ЖУРНАЛА


Журнал «Образование в Сибири» включает следующие разделы: общие проблемы образования; региональные и национальные вопросы образования; образовательные и педагогические инновации; из истории развития образования; памятники педагогической мысли; зарубежный опыт и международное сотрудничество в области образования; научные сообщения, проекты, информация.

Объем рукописей по общим, региональным, национальным и историческим проблемам, по образовательным и педагогическим инновациям, международному сотрудничеству в области образования – до 0,5 п.л.; для информационного раздела – до 0,2 п.л. Статьи принимаются в двух экземплярах. Все материалы печатаются через полтора интервала. Библиография оформляется в порядке нумерации и приводится в конце текста на отдельном листе. К материалам прилагается дискетный вариант в редакторе Word. На статью должны быть представлены две рецензии: одна из организации, где работает автор, вторая – от специалиста из другого учреждения.

К материалам на отдельном файле прилагается информация об авторе: полностью ФИО, ученая степень, звание, занимаемая должность, контактный телефон и адрес электронной почты.

Гонорар за публикации не выплачивается, рукописи авторам не возвращаются.


Материалы в журнал, а также заявки на него высылайте по адресу:

634041, г.Томск, пр.Комсомольский, 75. Институт развития образовательных систем РАО, ученому секретарю Черепановой Тамаре Борисовне.


Тел.: (8-382-2) 52-29-43

Е-mail: tamarach@tspu.edu.ru