Geum.ru

Національна юридична академія україни імені ярослава мудрого на правах рукопису сорокун віталій Миколайович

Вид материалаДокументы

Содержание


Pretty v. the United Kingdom
Подобный материал:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7
Honouring of obligations and commitments by Ukraine // coe.int//main.asp?link=coe.int/documents/

adoptedtext/ta99/eres1179.php
  1. Resolution 1495 (2006) Combating the resurgence of Nazi ideology // coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/adoptedtext/ta06/eres1495.php
  2. Resolution 1510 (2006) Freedom of expression and respect for religious beliefs //coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/adoptedtext/

ta06/eres1510.php
  1. Riera Blume and others v. Spain, App. №37680/97 (1999) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=37680/97&sessionid=6472343&skin=hudoc-en
  2. Rousseau, Jean Jaques. The Social Contract and the Discourses / Jean Jaques Rousseau. – London : David Campbell Publishers, Ltd., 1993. – 409 p.
  3. Sandler, S. Gerald. Lockean Ideas in Thomas Jefferson’s Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom / Sandler, S. Gerald // Journal of the History of Ideas. – University of Pennsylvania Press. – Jan.-Mar., 1960. – Vol. 21. – № 1. – Р. 110–116.
  4. Schachter, Oscar. Law-Making in the United Nations / Oscar Schachter // Perspectives on International Law. – The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995. – Р. 119–138.
  5. Schachter, Oscar. United Nations Law / Oscar Schachter // The American Journal of International Law. – Jan., 1994. Vol. 88. – № 1. – Р. 1–23.
  6. Seligman, Adam B. Tolerance, Tradition and Modernity / Adam B. Seligman // Cardozo Law Review. – 2003. – Vol. 24. – № 4.– Р. 1645–1656.
  7. Serif v. Greece, App. №38178/97 (1999) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=serif&sessionid=6638136&skin=hudoc-en
  8. Seven individuals v. Sweden, App. №8811/79 (1982) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=803645&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  9. Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law / Malcolm N. Shaw. – Fifth edition. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005. – 1288 p.
  10. Sieghart, Paul. The International Law of Human Rights / Paul Sieghart. – Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1995. – 569 p.
  11. Sixth periodic report of Ukraine on the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. – CCPR/C/UKR/6 // r.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/5038ebdcb712174dc1256a2a002796da/ 6d3f86095384366ac1256b06003cd524?OpenDocument
  12. Sullivan, Donna J. Advancing the Freedom of Religion or Belief through the UN Declaration on Elimination of Religious Intolerance and Discrimination / Donna J. Sullivan // American Journal of International Law. – (1988). – Vol. 82. – Р. 487–520.
  13. Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, App. №77703/01 (2007) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=52.%09Svyato-Mykhaylivska%20|%20Parafiya&sessionid=12343897&skin= hudoc-en
  14. Tahzib, Bahiyyih G. Freedom of Religion or Belief. Ensuring Effective International Legal Protection / Bahiyyih G. Tahzib. – The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996. – 640 p.
  15. Taylor, Paul. Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice / Taylor Paul. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005. – 405 p.
  16. Taylor, Paul. The basis for departure of European standard under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights from equivalent universal standards / Taylor Paul : Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. – 2001. – № 5. // cl.ac.uk/2001/issue5/taylor5.phpl
  17. Thayer, L. E. The Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire and the Question of their Abrogation as It Affects the United States / L. E. Thayer // The American Journal of International Law. – American Society of International Law. – Apr., 1923. – Vol. 17. – № 2. – Р.207–233.
  18. The Belgium Linguistics case, App. №1474/62; 1677/62; 1691/62; 1769/63; 1994/63; 2126/64 (1968) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?

item=6&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=belgium%20%7C%20linguistics&sessionid=6578306&skin=hudoc-en
  1. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2000 // arl.europa.eu/charter/default_en.php
  2. The Definitive Treaty of Peace and Friendship between His Britannick Majesty, the Most Christian King, and the King of Spain, 1763 // edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/britain/paris.php
  3. The Moscow Branch of The Salvation Army v. Russia, App. №72881/01 (2006) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=

hbkm&action= html&highlight=russia%20|%209&sessionid=9335646&skin=hudoc-en
  1. The Sacred and The Sovereign: Religion and International Politics / Edited by John D. Carlson and Erik C. Owens. – Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press, 2003. – 290 p.
  2. Thlimmenos v. Greece, App. №34369/97 (2000) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=thlimmenos%20%7C%20v.%20%7C%20greece&sessionid=6578913&skin=hudoc-en
  3. Tierney, Brian. Religious Rights: An Historical Perspective / Brian Tierney // Religious Human Rights in Global Perspectives: Religious Perspectives. – The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996. – P. 17 – 46.
  4. Treaty between the Principal Allied and Associated Powers and Czechoslovakia (Czechoslovak Minorities Treaty), 1919 // ii.edu.au/

au/other/dfat/treaties/1920/5.phpl
  1. Treaty between the Principal Allied and Associated Powers and Greece, concerning the Protection of Minorities in Greece, 1920 // ii.

edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1924/2.phpl
  1. Treaty between the Principal Allied and Associated Powers and Romania (Romanian Minorities Treaty), 1919 // ii.edu.au/au/other/

dfat/treaties/1920/13.phpl
  1. Treaty between the Principal Allied and Associated Powers and the Serb-Croat-Slovene State, 1919 // ii.edu.au/au/

other/dfat/treaties/1921/4.phpl
  1. Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Austria, 1919 // ii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1920/3.phpl
  2. Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Bulgaria, 1919 // ii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1920/4.phpl
  3. Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Hungary, 1920 // ii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1921/8.phpl
  4. Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Turkey, 1920 // yu.edu/~rdh7/wwi/versa/sevres1.phpl
  5. Treaty of Peace Between the United States Of America, The British Empire, France, Italy And Japan, And Poland (Polish Minority Treaty), 28.06.1919 // ii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1920/12.phpl
  6. Treaty of Peace, Amity and Commerce between China and the United States, signed at Tien-Tsin, 18 June 1858 // urce.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tien-Tsin_between_the_United_States_of_America_and_the_Empire_of_China
  7. Treaty of Peace, Amity, Commerce and Navigation between China and France, signed at Tien-Tsin, 27 June 1858 // Evans, Malcolm D. Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe. – Cambridge University Press, 1997. – Р. 62.
  8. Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Commerce between Great Britain and China, signed at Tien-Tsin, 26 June 1858 // urce.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tien-Tsin_between_the_Queen_of_Great_Britain_and_the_Emperor_of_China
  9. Union of Utrecht, 1579 // Evans, Malcolm D. Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe. – Cambridge University Press, 1997. – Р. 49.
  10. Valantasis, Richard. Religions of Late Antiquity in Practice / Richard Valantasis. – Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, 2000. – 527 p.
  11. Valsamis v. Greece, App. №21787/93 (1996) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=21787/93&sessionid=6423532&skin=hudoc-en
  12. Van Boven, Theo. Advances and Obstacles in Building Understanding and Respect between People of Diverse Religions and Beliefs / Theo van Boven // Human Rights Quarterly. – Nov., 1991. – Vol. 13. – № 4.– Р. 437–449.
  13. Van der Vyver, Johan D. Limitations of Freedom of Religion or Belief: International Law Perspectives / Johan D. van der Vyver // Emory International Law Review. – Summer, 2005. – Vol. 19. – № 2. – Р. 499–537.
  14. Van Dijk, Peter. Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights / Peter van Dijk, G. J. H. van Hoof. – The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998. – 850 p.
  15. Vienna Note of July 31, 1853 // Manning, Ralph. The Art of the Possible: Documents on Great Power Diplomacy, 1814-1914. – New York, etc. : The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1996. – Р. 101–102.
  16. Virginia Declaration of Rights, 1776 // edu/lawweb/avalon/states/va05.php
  17. Voltaire. Traite sur la tolerance a l’occasion de la mort de Jean Calas / Voltaire. – Paris : Librairie de la Bibliothèque National, 1887. – T. 1. – 160 p.
  18. Warsaw confederation, 1573 // atura.hg.pl/varsconf.php
  19. Weissbrodt, David. The Three "Theme" Special Rapporteurs of the UN Commission on Human Rights / David Weissbrodt // The American Journal of International Law. – American Society of International Law. – Jul., 1986. – Vol. 80. – № 3.– Р. 685–699.
  20. Wheaton, Henry. Elements du Droit international / Henry Wheaton. – Leipzig : F.A. Brockhaus, 1874. – T. 1. – 336 p.
  21. Wheaton, Henry. Elements du Droit international / Henry Wheaton. – Leipzig : F.A. Brockhaus, 1874. – T. 2. – 399 p.
  22. Wilhelm, Anthony G. Good Fences and Good Neighbours: John Locke’s Positive Doctrine of Toleration / Anthony G. Wilhelm // Political Research Quarterly. – University of Utah. – Mar., 1999. – Vol. 52. – № 1. – Р. 145–166.
  23. Wright, N. T. The New Testament and the People of God / N. T. Wright. – Fortress Press, Minneapolis, 1992. – 535 p.
  24. X v. Austria, App. №8652/79 (1981) // hr.coe.int/

tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=803769&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. Austria, App. №1747/62 (1963) // hr.coe.int/

tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=1747/62&sessionid=6402413&skin=hudoc-en
  1. X. v. Denmark, App. №7374/76 (1976) // hr.coe.int/

tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=804664&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. Germany, App. №8410/78 (1980) // hr.coe.int/

tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=803891&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. Germany, App. №8741/79 (1981) // hr.coe.int/

tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=803594&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. The Netherlands, App. №2988/66 (1967) // hr.

coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=2988/66&sessionid=6424463&skin=hudoc-en
  1. X. v. the United Kingdom, App. №5442/72 (1974) // r />

echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=804824&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. The United Kingdom, App. №7992/77 (1978) // r />

echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=803440&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. UK, App. №6886/75 (1976) // hr.coe.int/

tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=804684&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. UK, App. №8160/78 (1981) // hr.coe.int/

tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=804759&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. X. v. United Kingdom, App. №7291/75 (1977) // hr.

coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=804202&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. Yanasik v. Turkey, App. №14524/89 (1993) // hr.coe.

int/tkp197/view.asp?action=open&documentId=818451&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
  1. Zamula and Others v. Ukraine, App. №10231/02 (2005) // hr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=zamula&sessionid=12172121&skin=hudoc-en

1 Дуже цікавою з цього приводу є практика неурядових організацій: в рамках ООН – Конференції неурядових організацій “КОНГО” (.cx.la), в Європі – Коаліції зі свободи релігії та віросповідання “ОСЛО” (oalition.org).

1 Про порівняльну характеристику деяких з цих інструментів див. [467, с. 321-323]

1 Цей висновок було повторено у пар. 82 справи Pretty v. the United Kingdom [431]

1 Питання взаємодії міжнародного та внутрішнього права вирішуються, зокрема, Конституцією України [104, с. 5], Декларацією про державний суверенітет України [38, ст. 429], Законом України № 1906-IV “Про міжнародні договори України” [70, ст. 540], Законом України № 1543-XII “Про правонаступництво України” [74, ст. 617], Постановою Верховної Ради України № 2808-XII “Про приєднання України до Віденської конвенції про правонаступництво держав щодо договорів” [145, ст. 601] та іншими законами України.

1 Декларація про державний суверенітет України [30, ст. 429].

2 Парламентська Асамблея Ради Європи запросила Україну стати членом Ради Європи Висновком № 190 (1995) від 26 вересня 1995 р. [21]. Україна приєдналася до Статуту РЄ Законом України № 398/95-ВР “Про приєднання до Статуту Ради Європи” від 31 жовтня 1995 р. [75].

3 На цей час не існує жодного спеціального двостороннього або іншого багатостороннього договору України у сфері захисту релігійних прав.

4 Наприклад, див. ст. 13 (1, 8 та 12) Договору про відносини добросусідства і співробітництва між Україною та Румунією, ратифікованого Законом України від 17.07.1997 р. № 474/97-ВР [48].