Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H.L.A. Hart / Hacker P.M.S., Raz J., eds. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. — 532 p.
Lawless v. Ireland (No. 1) // European Human Rights Report. — 1979—1980. — № 1. — P. 1—11.
Leander v Sweden // European Human Rights Reports. — 1987. — № 9. — P. 433—462.
Lee T. Stare Decisis in Historical Perspective: From the Founding Era to the Rehnquist Court / T. Lee // Vanderbilt Law Review. — 1999. — № 52. — P. 647—735.
Lee T. The Anastasoff Case and the Judicial Power to «Unpublish» Opinions / T. Lee, L. Lehnhof // Notre Dame Law Review. — 2001. — № 77. — P. 135—173.
Lefroy A. Judge–Made Law / A. Lefroy // The Law Quaterly Review. — 1904. — Vol. XX. — № 80. — P. 399—414.
Lester A. English Judges as Law Makers / A. Lester // Public Law. — 1993. — P. 269—290.
Lewis v Attorney General of Jamaica // Appeal Cases Law Report. — 2001. — № 2 — P. 50—90.
Lingens v. Austria // European Human Rights Reports. — 1986. — № 8. — P. 407—424.
Loizidou v. Turkey // European Human Rights Reports. — 1997. — № 23. — P. 513—551.
London Street Tramways Co. v. London County Council // Appeal Cases Law Report. — 1898. — P. 375—381.
Lord Mackenzie Stuart. Judicial Decision as a Source of Community Law / Lord Mackenzie Stuart, J.–P. Warner; Grewe, Rupp and Schneider (eds) Festschrift für Hans Kutscher. — Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1981. — 472 p.
Losinger & Co. v. Yugoslavia // Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series C. — 1935. — № 78. — P. 110.
Loveland I. Affirming Roe v Wade? Planned Parenthood v Casey / I. Loveland // Public Law. — 1993. — P. 14—24.
Lundmark T. (Book Review) Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study. / T. Lundmark; edited by d. Neil Maccormick & Robert S. SUMMERS. Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited, 1997. PP. 585 // American Journal of Comparative Law. — 1998. — № 46 — P. 211—224.
Lundmark T. Introduction to German Law / Lundmark T.; edited by Werner F. Ebke and Matthew W. Finkin. Kluwer Law International, 1996. PP. 466 // American Journal of Comparative Law. — 1999. — № 47. — P. 677—687.
MacCormick D. Further General Reflections and Conclusions / D. MacCormick, R. Summers // Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study / N. MacCormick, R. Summers, eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1997. — P. 531—550.
MacCormick D. Introduction / D. MacCormick, R. Summers // Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study / MacCormick N., Summers R., eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publ., 1997. — Р. 1.
Macdonald R. The Margin of Appreciation in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights / R. Macdonald // International Law at the Time of Its Codification: Essays in Honour of Roberto Ago. — Milan: Giuffrè, 1988. — Р. 185—192.
Mahoney P. Judicial Activism and Judicial Self–Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Side of the Same Coin / P. Mahoney // Human Rights Law Journal. — 1990. — N 11. — Р. 64—68.
Maltz E. The Nature of Precedent / E. Maltz // North Carolina Law Review. — 1988. — № 66. — P. 367—393.
Mancini F. From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge Facing the European Court / F. Mancini, D. Keeling // Yearbook of European Law. — 1991. — Vol. 11. — P. 1—77.
Marbury v. Madison // United States Reports. — 1803. — Vol. 5. — P. 137.
Marshall G. What is Binding in a Precedent / G. Marshall // Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study / MacCormick N., Summers R., eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1997. — Р. 501—508.
Marshall W. Conservatives and the Seven Sins of Judicial Activism / W. Marshall // University of Colorado Law Review. — 2002. — Vol. 73. — P. 1217—1255.
Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society / Rheinstein M., ed. — Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1966. — 712 p.
Mazzotta F. Precedents in Italian Law / F. Mazzotta // Michigan State University–DCL Journal of International Law. — 2000. — № 9. — P. 121—151.
McCulloch v. Maryland // United States Reports. — 1819. — Vol. 17. — P. 316.
Megarry R.E. Dissenting Reasons in the Judicial Committee / R.E. Megarry // Law Quarterly Review. — 1998. — № 114. — P. 574—578.
Merit v. Ukraine // European Human Rights Reports. — 2005. — № 41. — P. 373-389.
Merrills J. The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights / J. Merrills. — Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993. — 265 р.
Merryman J.H. The Civil Law Tradition. An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America / J.H. Merryman. — Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1985. — 2—nd ed. — 168 p.
Merryman J.H. The French Deviation / J.H. Merryman // American Journal of Comparative Law. — 1996. — № 44. — P. 109—119.
Merryman J.H. The Italian Style III: Interpretation / J.H. Merryman // Stanford Law Review. — 1966. — № 18. — P. 583—611.
Meuer v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. // American State Reporter. — 1898. — Vol. 74. — P. 774.
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. U.S.) // International Court of Justice Reports. — 1986. — Р. 94—117.
Moragne v States Marine Lines Inc // United States Reports. — 1970. — Vol. 398. — P. 375.
Morawski L., Zirk–Sadowski M. Precedent in Poland / L. Morawski, Zirk– M. Sadowski // Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study / MacCormick N., Summers R., eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1997. — P. 219—258.
Morelle Ltd v Wakeling // Queen's Bench Law Reports. — 1955. — № 2 — P. 379—417.
Morrison v. Olson // United States Reports. — 1988. — Vol. 487. — P. 654.
Müller F. Juristische Methodik / Friedrich Müller. — 5., auf neuestem Stand bearb. und erg. Aufl. — Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1993. — 351 s.
Muller v. Switzerland // European Human Rights Reports. — 1991. — № 13. — P. 212—237.
Neuner J. Die Rechtsfindung contra legem / J. Neuner. — Munchen: Beck C. H., 1992. — 220 p.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Germany v. Denmark; Germany v. Netherlands) // International Court of Justice Reports. — 1969. — P. 3.
Note, Plurality Decisions and Judicial Decisionmaking // Harvard Law Review. — 1981. — № 94. — P. 1127—1146.
Novak L. Note. The Precedential Value of Supreme Court Plurality Decisions, / L. Novak // Columbia Law Review. — 1980. — № 80. — P. 756—781.
O'Donnell T. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Standards in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights / T. O'Donnell // Human Rights Quarterly. — 1982. — Vol. 4. — № 4. — P. 474—507.
Oehrle C. German Sovereign Immunity Defense (Interpretation by the German Courts) / C. Oehrle // Florida Journal of International Law. — 1991. — № 6. — P. 445—474.
Opinion on the implementation of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights adopted by the Venice Commission at its 53 Plenary Session (Venice, 13—14 December 2002) [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу до документа: e.coe.int/docs/2002/CDL-AD(2002)034-e.asp.
Palestine Contractors, Inc. v. Perkins // South Western Reporter, 2d. — 1964. — Vol. 386. — P. 764.
Papadopoulou R.–E. Principes generaux du Droit Communautaire / R.–E. Papadopoulou. — Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1996. — 319 p.
Papamichalopoulos v. Greece // European Human Rights Reports. — 1993. — № 16. — P. 440—461.
Parental Control Case, 10 BVerfGE 1.
Paulsen M. Accusing Justice: Some Variations on the Themes of Robert M. Cover's Justice Accused / M. Paulsen // Journal of Law and Religion. — 1989. — Vol. 7. — № 1. — P. 33—98.
Peczenik A. The Binding Force of Precedent / A. Peczenik // Interpreting Precedent: A Comparative Study / Summers R., MacCormick N., eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publ., 1997. — р.461—480.
Perry M. Morality, Politics and Law: A Bicentennial Essay / M. Perry. — New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. — 323 p.
Pildes R. Forms of Formalism / R. Pildes // University of Chicago Law Review. — 1999. — Vol. 66. — P. 607—620.
Planned Parenthood of South Eastern Pennsylvania v Casey // United States Reports. — 1992. — Vol. 505. — P. 833.
Potter H. Potter's Historical Introduction to English Law and its Institutions / H. Potter; Kiralfy A. K. R., ed. — 4th ed. — London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1958. — 675 p.
Pound R. Interpretations of Legal History / R. Pound. — New York: The Macmillan company, 1923. — 171 р.
Pratar D. The Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Court / D. Pratap. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972. — 292 p.
Precedent in English Law / Cross R., Harris J., ed. — 3rd ed. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. — 224 p.
Precedent in English Law / Cross R., Harris J., ed. — 4th ed. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. — 256 p.
Prime T., Scanlan G. Stare Decisis and the Court of Appeal; Judicial Confusion and Judicial Reform / T. Prime, G. Scanlan // Civil Justice Quarterly. — 2004. — № 23. — P. 212—227.
Prott L. The Latent Power of Culture and the International Judge / L. Prott. — Abingdon: Professional Books, 1979. — 250 p.
Prott L. The Style of Judgment in the International Court of Justice / L. Prott // Australian Yearbook of International Law. — 1970—73. — P. 75—90.
Quinn M. Argument and Authority in Common Law Advocacy and Adjudication: An Irreducible Pluralism of Principles / M. Quinn // Chicago–Kent Law Review. — 1998—2000. — No. 74. — P. 655 — 778.
R. v. National Insurance Commissioner ex p. Hudson // Appeal Cases Law Reports. — 1972. — P. 944.
Radbruch G. Gesetzliches Unrecht und ubergesetz liches Recht (1946) / G. Radbruch // Rechtsphilosophie. Heidelberg, 1983. — S. 354—358.
Radin M. Case Law and Stare Decisis: Concerning Prjudizienrecht in Amerika / M. Radin // Columbia Law Review. — 1933. — № 33. — P. 199—212.
Ray L. Justice Brennan and the Jurisprudence of Dissent / L. Ray // Temple Law Review. — 1988. — № 61. — P. 307—352.
Recommendation N R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 January 2000 at the 694 meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу до документа: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=334147&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=9999CC&BackColorIntranet=FFBB55&BackColorLogged=FFAC75
Recommendation N R (80) 2 concerning the exercise of dicretionary powers by administrative authorities (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 March 1980 at 316th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу до документа: https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?Command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&DocId=667510&SecMode=1&Admin=0&Usage=4&InstranetImage=45576
Recommendation Rec (2002) 13 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the publication and dissemination in the member states of the text of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 December 2002 at the 822 meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу до документа: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=331657&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=9999CC&BackColorIntranet=FFBB55&BackColorLogged=FFAC75
Recommendation Rec (2004) 5 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the verification of the compatibility of draft laws, existing laws and administrative practice with the standards laid down in the European Convention on Human Rights (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 May 2004 at its 114 Session) [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу до документа: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=743297&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=9999CC&BackColorIntranet=FFBB55&BackColorLogged=FFAC75
Rees v. the United Kingdom // European Human Rights Reports. — 1987. — № 9. — P. 56—70.
Rehnquist W. The Changing Role of Supreme Court / W. Rehnquist // Florida State University Law Review. — 1986—1987. — № 14. — P. 1—14.
Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide // International Court of Justice Reports. — 1951. — Р. 13—18.
Richardson L., Mandell L. Fairness Over Fortuity: Retroactivity Revisited and Revised / L. Richardson, L. Mandell // Utah Law Review. — 1989. — P. 11—61.
Ringeisen v. Austria // European Human Rights Reports. — 1979—1980. — № 1. — P. 504—512.
Ringsted v Lady Lanesborough (1783) 3 Dougl. 197 at 203; 99 E.R. 610 at 613.
Rivero J. Rapport de synthese / J. Rivero. — Aix-en-Provence: Vander, 1982. — 736 p.
Roe v Wade // United States Reports. — 1973. — Vol. 410. — P. 113.
Rosenne S. The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920—1996 / S. Rosenne. — 3d. ed. — The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1997. — Vol. 3. — 1840 p.
S. v. Makwanyane and Another, Constitutional Court, South Africa 1995, CCT 3/1994, 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC), (per Chaskalson J.).
Sajo A. Constitutional Adjudication in Light of Discourse Theory / A. Sajo // Cardozo Law review. — 1996. — Vol. 17. — P. 1193—1229.
Salmi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services // Federal Reporter, 2d. — 1985. — Vol. 774. — P. 689.
Scanlan A. The Passing of Justice Murphy–The Conscience of a Court / A. Scanlan // Notre Dame Law Review. — 1949. — Vol. 25. — P. 7—39.
Schermers H. Judicial Protection in the European Communities / H. Schermers. — 3rd ed. —Deventer: Kluwer, 1983. — 495 р.
Schermers H. Judicial Protection in the European Union. / H. Schermers, D. Waelbroeck. — 6th ed. — The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001. — 889 p.
Schroeder F.–C. Social Courts and Administrative Justice in Pre-Revolutionary Russia: A Study in the Continuity of Russian Law / F.–C. Schroeder // European Legal Cultures / Gessner V., Hoeland A., Varga Cs., eds. — Dartmouth, 1996. — P. 224—229.
Schwartz H. The struggle for constitutional justice in Post-communist Europe. / Schwartz H. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. — 347 p.
Scofield R. The Distinction Between Judicial Dicta and Obiter Dicta / R. Scofield // Los–Angeles Lawyer. — 2002. — № 25. — P. 17—21.
Selznick P. The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community / P. Selznick. — Berkley: University of California Press, 1992. — 550 p.
Shahabuddeen M. Precedent in the World Court / M. Shahabuddeen. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. — 245 p.
Shany Y. Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law? / Y. Shany // European Journal of International Law. — 2005. — N. 16. — P. 907—940.
Sheffield and Horsham v. the United Kingdom (1998) // European Human Rights Reports. — 1999. — № 27. — P. 368-381.
Simon D. A Psychological Model of Judicial Decision Making / D. Simon // Rutgers Law Journal. — 1998. — № 30. — P. 1—142.
Sinclair M.B.W. The Semantics of Common Law Predicates / M.B.W. Sinclair // Indiana Law Journal. — 1986. — № 61. — P. 373—400.
Slynn G. The Court of Justice of the European Communities / G. Slynn // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. — 1984. — № 33. — P. 409—429.
Specialized Courts: A Concept Paper. Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative. Legislative Assistance and Research Program. — CEELI Concept Paper Series. — 1996. — 80 p.
Sprecher R. The Development of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis and the Extent to Which It Should Be Applied / R. Sprecher // American Bar Association Journal. — 1945. — № 31. — P. 501—509.
State v. Valmont Plantations // South Western Reporter, 2nd — 1961. — Vol. 346. — P. 853.
Stone A. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: the Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective / A. Stone. — New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. — 312 p.
Stran Greek Refineries v. Greece // European Human Rights Reports. — 1995. — № 19. — P. 293—332.
Summers R.S. Precedent in the United States (New York State) / R.S. Summers // Interpreting Precedent: A Comparative Study / Summers R., MacCormick N., eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publ., 1997. — P. 355—406.
Sundberg J. Intent or Effect — a Look at Legislative Intent / J. Sundberg. — Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1992. — 1512 p.
Sweet A. The Politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe / A. Sweet // International Journal of Constitutional Law. — 2007. — Vol. 5. — № 1. — P. 69—92.
Talbot v. Seeman // United States Reports. — 1801. — Vol. 5. — p. 1.
Taruffo M. Institutional Factors Influencing Precedents / M. Taruffo // Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study / MacCormick N., Summers R., eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publ., 1997. — P. 437—460.
Taruffo M. Precedent in Italy / M. Taruffo, M. La Torre // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / MacCormick N., Summers R., eds. — Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1997. — P. 141—188.
Tashnet M. Following the Rules Laid Down: A Critique of Interpretivism and Neutral Principles / M. Tashnet // Harvard Law Review. — 1983. — № 96. — P. 781—827.
Teitel R. Transitional Justice / R. Teitel. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. — 292 p.
Teubner G., Boucquey N. Droit et reflexivite: L'auto–référence en droit et dans l'organisation; traduit de l'allemand par Nathalie Boucquey avec la collaboration de Gaby Maier / G. Teubner, N. Boucquey. — Paris: L.G.D.J., 1996. — 393 p.
The Federalist No. 78 // Hamilton A., Jay J., Madison J., et al. / Federalist and other Constitutional Papers / Scott E. H., ed. — Chicago: Scott, Foresman & Co., 1898 — Р. 471—476.
The Last Temptation of Christ Case (Olmedo Bustos v. Chile) [Електронний ресурс] — Режим доступу до документа: idh.or.cr/pais.cfm?id_Pais=4
The Mind of the Founder: Sources of the Political Thought of James Madison / ed. by M. Meyers. — Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1981. — 576 p.
The Political Works of Marcus Tullius Cicero / Barham F., ed. — London: Edmund Spettigue, 1841. — Vol. I. — 380 p.
The Political Works of Marcus Tullius Cicero / Barham F., ed. — London: Edmund Spettigue, 1841. — Vol. IІ. — 324 p.
Thomas v. Meyer, 168 S.W.2d 681, 685 (Tex. Civ. App. 1943, no writ).
Tocqueville A. Democracy in America / A. Tocqueville. — London: Anchor Publishing, 1969. — 778 p.
Toth A.G. Legal Protection of Individuals in the European Communities / A.G. Toth. — Amsterdam North–Holland, 1978. — Vol 1. — 420 p.
Tridimas G. National Courts and the European Court of Justice: A Public Choice Analysis of the Preliminary Reference Procedure / G. Tridimas, T. Tridimas // International Review of Law and Economy. — 2004. — Vol. 24. — № 2. — P. 125—145.
Tridimas T. The General Principles of EC Law / T. Tridimas. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. — 377 p.
Troper M. Precedent in France / M. Troper, C. Grzegorczyk // Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study / MacCormick N., Summers R., eds. — 1997. — р.103—140.
United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (U.S. v. Iran) // International Court of Justice Reports. — 1980. — Р. 3—9.
United States v. Heth // United States Reports. — 1806. — Vol. 7. — P. 399.
United States v. Reality Co. // United States Reports. — 1895. — Vol. 161. — p. 237—249.
United States v. Vidaver // Federal Supplement. — 1947. — Vol. 73. — P. 382.
Vile M. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers / M. Vile. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. — 359 p.
Vogt v. Germany // European Human Rights Reports. — 1996. — № 21. — P. 205—249.
Wechsler H. Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law / H. Wechsler // Harvard Law Review. — 1959. — Vol. 73. — P. 1—35.
Weiler J.H.H. The Transformation of Europe / J.H.H. Weiler // Yale Law Journal. — 1991. — № 100. — P. 2403—2483.
Weiner v. U.S. // United States Reports. — 1958. — Vol. 357. — P. 349.
Weiss G. The Enchantment of Codification in the Common Law World / G. Weiss // Yale Journal of International Law. — 2000. — № 25. — P. 435—532.
Westbrook R. The Character of Ancient Near Eastern Law / R. Westbrook // A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law / Beckman G., Jasnow R., Levine B. etc., eds. — Vol. 1. — Leiden: Brill, 2003. — P. 1—92.
Whaley D. A Suggestion for the Prevention of No-Clear-Majority Judicial Decisions / D. Whaley // Texas Law Review. — 1968. — Vol. 46. — № 3. — P. 370—378.
Whiteman M., Digest of International Law / M. Whiteman. — Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963. — 856 p.
Wynne–Finch v. Chaytor // Chancery Law Reports. — 1903. — Vol. 2. — P. 475.
X., Y. and Z. v. United Kingdom // European Human Rights Reports. — 1997. — № 24. — P. 143–180.
Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd // King's Bench Law Reports. — 1944. — P. 718—730.
Yourow H. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence / H. Yourow. — The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996. — 224 p.
Yourow H. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence / H. Yourow // Connecticut Journal of International Law. — 1987. — Vol. 3. — №1. — P. 111—160.
Zeidler W. The Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany: Decisions on the Constitutionality of Legal Norms / W. Zeidler // Notre Dame Law Review. — 1987. — Vol. 62. — №4. — P. 504—525.
Zhiqiang Wang. Case Precedent in Qing China: Rethinking Traditional Case Law / Zhiqiang Wang // Columbia Journal of Asian Law. — 2005. — № 19. — P. 323—344.
Zimmermann R. Statuta Sunt Stricte Interpretanda? Statutes and the Common Law: A Continental Perspective / R. Zimmermann // Cambridge Law Journal. — 1997. — Vol. 56. — № 2. — P. 315—328.
Zo Bell K. Division of Opinion in the Supreme Court: A History of Judicial Disintegration / K. Zo Bell // Cornell Law Quarterly. — 1959. — Vol. 44. — № 2. — P. 186—214.
