Т. И. Тураходжаев методы эффективной дефолиации различных сортов хлопчатника

Вид материалаДокументы
Подобный материал:
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18
  • Ястрембович Н.И., Калинин Ф.А.//Научные труды украинского. НИИ физиологии растений.Киев: Изд-во УАСХИ, Киев, 1962.Вып.23.С.119.
  • Addicot F.Tand Lynch R.S.// Advanсes in Agronomy.1957.V.9.Р.67-69.
  • Addicot F.T. Abscission Losangeles,//Vniv/of California. Press, Berkeley. London:1982.- 369 p.
  • Ash A., Karr E.H., 1953. Amagnesium chlorate product as a new cotton defoliant. Agr. Chem, 1953.
  • Brown L.C., Payne C.L.//Argon J.1954.№ 46.
  • Accelerating Cotton boll opening with Foliar treatments/ Crawpord S.//Y Loisiana, Agriculture. 1981. Vol. 25. Р.12-13 (Ускорение темпов раскрытия коробочек хлопчатника путем примененич десикантов)
  • Accelerated Cotton boll Dehiacence with Growth Regulator and Desicant Chemicales/ George W. Cathey, Kirk E, Luckett//Field Crops Research. 1982. Vol. 5.№ 2.Р. 113-120 (Ускорение процесса раскрытия коробочек хлопчатника посредством регуляторов роста).
  • Baker E.A., Grace H. Developmental changes in leaf epicuticnla waxes in relation to foliar penetration//New Phytol., 1981.№9. 88, Р.731-747.
  • Basra Amarjits, Malik C.P., What we know about formation to cotton filres//“Everyman’s sci:”, 1986 21, N-2.41-48(англ.)(Что мы знаем о формировании волоконец хлопчатника).
  • Brummund M. Einflens des defoliations termins aufden Ver lanf der Lupin-enernte//Dt. Landwirtsch. Ig.14. h. 8.1963. S. 379-382.
  • Bukovac M.J., Flore J.A., Baker E.A. Peach leaf surfaces: changes in wetiabiality, retention, cuticular permeability and epicuticula wax chemistry during expansion with special reference to spray application. J.Amer. Soc. Hort. Sei.1979. V. 104. № 5. р. 611-617.
  • Campbell J.Selutive cotton stripping with, frost that comes in cans. The cotton Gin and oil Mill Press.1951. Vol 52, № 20.Р. 18-19,26.
  • Cantliffe D.J., Wilcox G.E. Effect of surfactant on ion penetration through leaf wax and wax model//J.Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1972. V.97. №3. Р.360-363.
  • Cathey W. G.Accelerition of bolle dehiscense with desiceant chemicals //Argon J.”1979. 71.№ 3. 505-508.
  • Cathy George W. Conditioning cotton for increased response to defoliant chemicals//”Field Crops Res.”1985.V.10/ №4.H/347-353.
  • Cathey George W., Luckett Kirk E., Rayburn S.T. Accelerated cottn boll dehiscence with growth regulator and desicant chemicals//Field Crops
    Res.1982. 5,№2. V.113-120.
  • Cathey S.W., Luckett K.E., Rayburn S.T.// Field Crops Res. 1982. V. № 2. Р. 113.
  • Cathey S.W.// Field Crops.Res. 1985. V. 10.№ 4. Р. 347.
  • Crafts A.S.Ann. Rev.Plant Physiol., 1953Т.4Р. 253-282.
  • Cathey S.W., Luckett K.E., Rayburn S.T.// Field Crops Res. 1982. V. № 2. Р. 113.
  • Cook E.D.Cotton defoliation in the Beak land area of Texas-1957// Precluding of twelfth annual belt wide cotton defoliation and physiology conference//Published by National cotton conncie, Memphis Tennesell,1957.
  • Cook E.D., Cotton defoliants and desiccants for 1960. Proclldings of Fourteenth Annual Beltwide Cotton defolition and physiology conference//Published by National Cotton Council, Memphus, Tennessec, 1960.
  • Cothren I. Accelerated boll opening and increased yield in Cotton with an ethylone – stimulating Compound/Cothren I.(Cothren I, 1981., - Влияние этилена на ускорение темпов раскрытия коробочек и повышение урожая хлопка Accelerated boll opening and increased yield in Cotton with an ethylone – stimulating Compound/Cothren I, - Plant Growth Regulator, 1981, Vol, 9, № 1, р. 7-9) - Plant Growth Regulator. 1981. Vol. 9. № 1. Р. 7-9.
  • Ethefon may hasten Cotton boll opening, increase yield Weir Bill L. Gaggera T.M.//California Egriculture. Vol, 36. № 10. 345б .Ethphon may hosten cotton boll opening inerease yield/Bill J. etal-Colifornia. Agriculture 1982. Vol. 36. № 9. Р.28-анг.
  • Ethephon may has ton Cotton boll opening increase yield/Bill L//etal-California Agriculture, 1982. Vol. 36. № 9.Р.28.( Влияние этрела на темпы раскрытия коробочек и урожайность хлопчатника)
  • Ethefon may hasten Cotton boll opening, inerease yield/wier Bill L, Gaggero T.M.//California Agriculture. Vol, 36. № 10.( Этефон может ускорять раскрытие коробочек хлопчатника.)
  • Elliott. F. C.Cotton defoliation and desiccation in Texas in 1959. Procecdings of Fourtelnth Annual Beltwide Cotton defoliation and physiology conference//Published by National Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee, 1960.
  • Hagman A.R//Beltwide Catton Prusuction Mechanization Conf. Nevada: Los Vegas, 2.P.104.
  • Harvey, Lanrence H. Defoliation recommendations for cotton /Df. Clemson S. C.1986.-9p.
  • Hauska G., Frebat A., Koetter G/Naturforsch.1975. 30.№ 7-8. S.505.
  • Herret R.A, ct all. Plant Physial. 1962. V. 37. № 3.P.358-363.
  • Hull H.M. Leaf structure as related to absorption of pest odes and other compounds – in Residue Review, ed. F.A. Gunther, Springer – Verlag, New-York, Heidelberg, Eerlin. 1970. V. 31.P.115.
  • Iruthayaraj M.R.Vse of defoliants discreants and carly termination//Pesticides, 14№9, 25-29 (Использование дефолиантов и ускорение созревания хлопчатника).
  • Gavva I.Timing and Coverage vital in Defoliant Cotton California-Arisona//USA.1980. Vol. 15. № 10. Р. 27-28.
  • Greene D.W., Bukovac M. J.Stomatal penetration effect of surfactants and role in foliar absorption//Amer.J. Bot. V.6. № 1. P. 100-106.
  • Kerby Thomas A., Johnson Stephanie, Yamada Hidemi, 1984, “Calif, Agr.”38, №9, 24-25 (анг.). Действенность дефолиантов на хлопчатнике.
  • Grelne D.W., Bukavac M.J.Feliar penetration of naphthaleneacetic acid enhancement by light and role of stomafa//Amer J. Bot., 1977.V. 64. № 1. P. 96-100.
  • King M.G., Rodosevech R.Tonoak, leaf surface characteristics and abcorption of triclopyr//Wced Soi., 1979.27.P.599.
  • Laca – buendia J.P., Del C., Ferreira L.L b Triangulo Mineiro Efeito de desfolhantes na cultura algodoeira (Gossypium hirsutum L) no Triangulo mineiro. Planta daninha. 1979.V.2. №2, P.102-106 (Действие дефолиантов на хлопчатнике G. hirsutum).
  • Leece D.R.Foliar absorption in Prunus domstical L, Nature and development of the surface wax barrier//Aust J. Plant Physiol.1978.V.5. № 6.P.749-766.
  • Livingston G.A.Plant Physiol. 1950.V.25.P.711-721.
  • Lynen Ochva. Federation Proceedings. 1953 V.12. №3. P.683.
  • Mishra D., Pradhan G.C. De layed wilting of tomato plants by chemical closure of stomata//Bot.Mag. Tokyo, 1968.№81, Р.219-225.
  • Morgan P.W//Agie chemicals of the Futurel/Ed. Hilton J.K. (Belsville Symposia of Agricul. Research, 1983.)USA,1985.
  • Murphy P.A.Canada Dept. Agric. Bull. 1921.№44.
  • Norris R.F., Bukovac M.J.zeffect of pH on penetration of naphthalene acetic acid and naphthalene ace amide through isolated pear cuticle//Plant physiol. 1972.V.49. № 4. P.615-618.
  • Petersеn E.I.Tvangsmonding of keverfrafdrder//Tidsskr., Fravl. 1962.V.26.№.2, S.18-20.
  • Sands R., Bachelard E.P.Uptake of picloranm by eucalypt leaf discs: role stomata//New phytol., 1973.V.72.P.87-99.
  • Singh Dalip, Tripathi H.P. Gossypium hirsutum//Effect of chemical defoliants in hirsutum cotton .Pesticides.1982.V.16.№3.P.12-14.
  • Smith C. Wayne, Valvil J.J. Differential recovery among cotton genotypes following early – season defoliation//Crop Sei1984.V.24.№ 1.P.151-153.(Дифференцированное восстановление (продуктивности) различных генотипов хлопчатника послей ранней дефолиации).
  • Smith C.W., Gothren J.T., Varvil J.J.//Acrial Applicater, 1984.V.22.№4.P.5.
  • Shafizadeh F., a Wolfram M.J.Amer.Chem.Soc., 1956.V.78. 2494.
  • Schonher J., Bukovac M.J., 1979. Penetration of stomata liguids: dependence on surface tension, wettability and stomatal morphology. – Plant Physiol. ,V.49, P. 813-819.
  • Suttle J.C.//Plant Physiol.1984.V.75.№1.P.126
  • Suttle J.C.//Plant Physiol.1985.V.78.№2.P.272
  • Suttle J.C.//Plant Physiol.1988.V.86.№1.P.241
  • Tukey H.B (Ed). Plant Regulators in agriculture, Wilay, New York, 1954.
  • Tullah A.P. Composition of leaf surface waxes of Triticium species: variation with age and tissue. Phytechem. 1973.V.12.P.1225-1232.
  • Tharp W.H. et all Agricultural Research Service. Washington, 1961.P.21.
  • Vigh L., Horwath, Farkas Tet all Stomatal behavior and cuticular properties of maize leeves of different chilling- resistance during cold treatment//Physiol.Plant. 1981.V.51.№3, P.287-290.
  • Wanjura D.F., Barker G.L.Cotton lint yiekd accumulation rate and guality development//Field crops Res. 1985.V.10,№3.P.205-218.(Темпы накопления волокна хлопчатника и рaзвитие его качества).
  • Whitweel T., Brown S.M., Mc. Guire J.A.//Applied Agric.Research.1987.V.2.№1.P.15.
  • Whitweel T., Walker H.//Alabama Agr.Exp.Sta. Cirular.1985.№1.P283.
  • Wullschleger S.O., Ocsterhnis D.M., 1989.the occurance of an internal cuticle in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) leaf stomates-Environ.Exp.Bot, 29, 2 P.229-236.
  • Jang S.F., Hoffman N.E.//Ann.Rev.Plant physiol.1984.V.35.№2.P.155.
  • Jip W., Yang S.F.//Plant Physiol.1986.V.80.№2.Р.515.