Iv российский философский конгресс
Содержание25 мая, среда, 9.00-12.30
25 мая, среда, 13.30-16.30
26 мая, четверг, 9.00-16.30
27 мая, пятница, 9.00-12.30
27 мая, пятница, 13.30-16.30
The Programme
25 May, Wednesday, 9.00-12.30
25 May, Wednesday, 13.30-16.30
26 May, Thursday, 9.00-16.30
27 May, Friday, 9.00-12.30
27 May, Friday, 13.30-16.30
Илья Касавин (Россия). Вступительное слово
Первое заседание
First session
Alexander Pechenkin (Russia). Comments to Prof. J. Margolis’ paper “Conceptual differences in modeling the physical and the huma
В.Г. Федотова (Россия). Когнитивные принципы в социально-гуманитарных науках
Valentina Fedotova (Russia). Cognitive Principles in the Social and Human Sciences
Social construction of reality
J. Habermas' communicative theory
Пирмин Штекелер-Вайтхофер (Германия) Логика «Нас» в психологии и социальных науках
0. Philosophy and social sciences
1. Individual and plural subjects of actions
2. Collective action and mere coordination
3. Cooperative actions and division of labor
4. Commitment in free cooperation
5. The moral duty of trust and its limits
Natalia Smirnova (Russia). Comments on the Prof. Stekeler’s paper “The logic of "Us" in psychology and the social sciences”
Знание и социальная трансформация
Elena Trubina (Russia). On narratives and voices: is there something epistemology can learn from the predicament of qualitative
Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer. Why do we need qualitative studies in the social sciences? A short commentary to the contribution of
At its core, scientific inquiry is the same in all fields.
Ким, Еуи-Су (Корея). Философы должны быть способны влиять на системы ценностей
1. The matter of establishing value system and value neutralization
2. Mission of Philosophers - Finding new values
Maintaining healthy value system
Practice is important
3. Common-sense rationality is important
We need to work with ordinary people
4. Cultures (civilizations) coexist
Self-reflection, open mind, and universality
5. We need 'philosophy of Earth'
Ilya Kasavin (Russia). Comments to: “Philosophers should be able to Influence Value Systems”, by Eui-Soo Kim, Korea
On the role of philosophy in cultural synthesis
Валентин Бажанов (Россия). Наука в переходном обществе: поиск стратегии выживания
Valentin A. Bazhanov (Russia) Science in the Transitional Society: The Quest for Survival Strategy
Alternative approaches towards strategy of the delopment of social structures
Social nominalism principles as basis for r&d state policy
Organizational forms of scientific policy
References (all papers are in Russian)
Владимир Колпаков. Комментарий к докладу проф. Бажанова
On scientific realism
Science, scientific realism and epistemology
Scientific realism and Kant’s critical philosophy
Constructivism construed
Kantian constructivism
Conclusion: Scientific realism, idealist constructivism and history
Elena Trubina (Russia). In response to Tom Rockmore’s paper «Scientific Realism, Idealist Constructivism, and History»
И.Т. Касавин. Эпистемология и идея междисциплинарности
Ilya Kasavin (Russia). Еpistemology and idea of interdisciplinarity
1. Interdisciplinarity as a problem
2. Interdisciplinarity and empirical basis for philosophical study
3. Interdisciplinarity as a danger for philosophy?
The Forms of Interdisciplinarity
Is Philosophy an Interdisciplinary Domain? What is Philosophy?
Ром Харре (Великобритания). Гибридная психология: союз дискуср-анализа с нейронаукой
The Central Role of Language
Language and the Limits of the Thinkable
Each language favors, but does not determine a certain style of thinking.
Language as the Medium of Public Expression of Private Experience
Language unifies the public and the private domains of experience.
The Stream of Action
Lives as Narratives
The Act-Action Distinction
A stream of acts is interpreted as a narrative
Mind has both a private and a public aspect as a discourse.
The grammars of everyday life
Meta-discourses or `Human Sciences'
Human sciences are discourses organized by the use of the same three grammars.
Rethinking the Problem
The task-tool link
Dispositions, Powers, Skills and Capacities, and their Material Groundings
The Taxonomic Priority Thesis
The P-, O- and M-grammars can be unified by the use of three metaphors: tasks and tools, skills and their groundings and top-dow
The basic particulars
Each grammar presupposes its proper type of active being: persons, organisms and molecules
Grigorii Goutner (Russia). Comments on Rom Harre “Hybrid Psychology: The marriage of discourse analysis with neuroscience”
Наталия Смирнова (Россия). Феноменологическая концепция релевантности и ее значение для современной теории познания
Notes and references
Tom Rockmore (USA). Phenomenology and Knowledge: Response to Smirnova
Григорий Гутнер (Россия). Прагматический аспект научного дискурса
Joe Margolis (USA). Reply to G. Goutner
Никос Псаррос (Германия). pluribus unum – Логика наук (и)
The Delimitations of the Sciences
The Difference between Natural and Social Sciences
United States of Science?
Helena Gourko (USA). Comments on Nikos Psarros’s presentation
Четвертое заседание
2. Models of complexity
3. The non-traditional elements and its problems
4. Complexity theories and the constitutive commitments of scientific systems
5. The constitutive principles
Валентин Бажанов (Россия). Комментарий к докладу Ханса Позера
Александр Печенкин (Россия). Парадигма и идеология. Исторический пример
Alexandre Pechenkin (Russia). Paradigm and Ideology. A Historical Example.
Hans Poser (Germany). How to justify a justification. Comments on Alexandre Pechenkin’s paper
2. Discovery and justification
3. A systematic problem
3. Conventions, contingency, and Kant on truth
4. Reasons for the acceptance of the Belusow-Zhabotinsky-Reaction
Людмила Маркова (Россия). Изменчивость и стабильность в науках
Problems of the philosophy of science in the context of Rene Thom’s ideas.
Arcady Blinov (Australia). Comments on Prof. Markova’s Paper
Знание, вера и рациональность
1. Epistemic vs aggregative rationality
2. The game of the Good Jailer: An epistemic dilemma for the prisoners
3. The game of the Good Jailer: Possible generalisations and applications
4. Some implications for the issue of organization of cognitive labour
Ludmila Markova (Russia). Comments to A. Blinov's paper «Knowledge and Social Suboptimality»
Владимир Колпаков (Россия). О современном кризисе экономической теории и путях его преодоления
Vladimir Kolpakov (Russia). On the Modern Economic Theory Crisis and Ways of Its Overcoming
Interdisciplinarity as a trend in overcoming the difficulties
Valentina Fedotova (Russia). Economic Theory Crisis Analysis and Ways of its Overcoming. Comments on V. Kolpakov’s paper
Social and cultural reasons for economic science crisis
Globalization, change in labour motivation and work conditions in Western countries along with unsuccessful post-communist trans
Mechanism of transformation of social impacts into paradigmatic shifts of economic theory
Kolpakov points out that interdisciplinarity plays a role of invitation to methodological communication.
What do we get from interdisciplinary synthesis?
Елена Гурко (США). Знание и религия: радикальная интерпретация Деррида
Еуи-Су Ким (Корея). Комментарий к докладу Елены Гурко
The Theory of Epistemic Rationality
Games and Economic Behavior
Шулятиков В.М.
