«Постановления Европейского Суда по правам человека: опыт исполнения в регионах России»

1   2   3

Eric Fribergh: Pilot judgments from the Court’s perspective, STOCKHOLM COLLOQUY, 9-10 June 2008;

Report on the Effectiveness of National Remedies in respect of Excessive Length of Proceedings adopted at Venice Commission 69th Plenary Session of December 2006.

Report of the Steering Committee for Human Rights, GT-DH-PR A (2006)003, Ensuring the existence of effective means at domestic level for the speedy execution of the European Court’s judgments. Avenues for reflection proposed by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the Court, 12 December 2006.

1European Court of Human Rights, Annual Report 2008.

2Под конвенционным механизмом понимается как работа самого Европейского Суда, так и деятельность других органов Совета Европы (в первую очередь, Комитета Министров) по содействию исполнению его решений странами-участниками Совета Европы.

3Resolution on Institutional and functional arrangements for the protection of human rights at national and European level, adopted at the European Ministerial Conference on Human Rights, held in Rome in November 2000.

4Mr Walter Schwimmer, Secretary General, statement made at the opening session of the Ministerial Conference in November 2000, Council of Europe Publishing, 20; Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 8-1; Appendix to СМ Recommendation Rec(2004)6, 12 May2004; Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the ECtHR, 6 February 2008.

5CM (2006) 203, 15 November 2006, Report of the Group of Wise Persons to the Committee of Ministers, 25; CM/Rec (2008) 2, Explanatory Report to Protocol No 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 14.

6 PACE Resolution 1226 (2000), 28 September 2000, Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1.

7Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1^st Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, p.7.

8 PACE Resolution 1226 (2000), 28 September 2000, Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 8.

9Луизиду [Loizidou] против Турции, 15318/89б 18 декабря 1996;Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 39.

10Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 45.

11Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 46.

12Маркс [Marckx] против Бельгии, 6833/74, 12 июня 1979.

13Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 49.

14Гайгусуз [Gaygusuz] против Австрии, 17371/90, 16 сентября 1996.

15Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 54-55.

16Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 57.

17Стрэн Грик Рефайнериз и Страти Андреадис [Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis] против Греции, 13427/87, 9 декабря 1994.

18Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 59.

19 CM Resolution Res(2004)3 on judgments revealing an underlying systemic problem, 12 May 2004

20Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 62-66.

21Мэтьюз [Matthews] против Великобритании, 24833/94, 18 февраля 1999.

22Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Implementation of decisions of the European Court of Human Right, 21 December 2001, 16.

23PACE Resolution 1411 (2004), Implementation of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, 14-15.

24 PACE Resolution 1516 (2006), Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 18-19; Expanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 18 September 2006, 98-99.

25GT-DH-PR A (2006)003, Ensuring the existence of effective means at domestic level for the speedy execution of the European Court’s judgments. Avenues for reflection proposed by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the Court, 12 December 2006.

26Хаккар [Hakkar] против Франции, 19033/91, 27июня 1995; Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 52.

27AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 52.

28CM(2006)39 final, Report by the Ministers’ Deputies on Ensuring the continued effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights – The implementation of the reform measures, 12 May 2006.

29AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 52.

30Веебер [Veeber] против Эстонии, 45771/99, 21 января.2003 года.

31AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 69.

32Подбельский и ППУ Полпур [Podbielski and PPU Polpure] против Польши, 39199/98, 26 июля 2005.

33AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 69.

34AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 53-54.

35AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 64.

36AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 60-61.

37Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 18 September 2006, 91.

38 Сборник практических материалов; руководство.

39 Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2nd Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2008, p.24.

40 CM/AS(2007)Rec1764 final, Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the PACE Recommendation 1764 (2006) on Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human, 30 March 2007, 8.

41Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2^nd Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2008, p.11-14.

42Зана [Zana] против Турции, 18954/91, 25 ноября 1997.

43См., например, доклад Комиссии, посвященный средствам защиты от чрезмерной длительности судебных разбирательств: Report on the Effectiveness of National Remedies in respect of Excessive Length of Proceedings adopted at 69th Plenary Session of December 2006.

44См., например, доклад Комиссии, посвященный проблеме неисполнения судебных решений в РФ: Examination of problems related to the execution of decisions by national civil courts against the state and its entities in the Russian Federation, adopted by the CEPEJ at its 6^th plenary meeting (7 – 9 December 2005).

45nt/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/Execution/default_en.asp.

46Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1^st Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2007, p.9; CM/AS(2007)Rec1764 final, Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the PACE Recommendation 1764 (2006) on Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human, 30 March 2007, 7.

47 CM/AS(2007)Rec1764 final, Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the PACE Recommendation 1764 (2006) on Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human, 30 March 2007, 4.

48Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1^st Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2007, p.7.

49Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1^st Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2007, p.12-13.

50Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2^nd Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2008, p.7.

51Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1^st Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2007, p.20.

52Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1^st Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2007, p.12-13.

53CM/Inf/DH (2008)7, 15 January 2009.

54CM/Inf/DH (2008)42, 28 November 2008.

55 CM/Inf/DH (2008) 33, 11 September 2008; CM/Inf/DH (2008) 33add, 28 November 2008.

56 CM/Inf/DH (2008) 2, 27 February 2008; CM/Inf/DH (2008) 2rev, 28 November 2008.

57 CM/Inf/DH (2008) 26, 23 May 2008.

58Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2^nd Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2008, p.12.

59The Pilot-Judgment Procedure. Information note issued by the Registrar of the ECtHR

60CM Resolution Res (2004) 3 on judgments revealing an underlying systemic problem, 12 May 2004

61Брониовский [Broniowski] против Польши, 31443/96, 22 июня 2004

62 PACE Resolution 1516 (2006), Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 21

63 Erik Fribergh, Pilot judgments from the Court’s perspective, STOCKHOLM COLLOQUY, 9-10 June 2008;

Comments by Mr. Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights, on the interim report of the Group of Wise Persons to the Committee of Ministers, 12

64Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2^nd Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2008, p.8

65 CM/Rec (2008) 2, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the ECtHR, 6 February 2008, 1.

66GT-DH-PR A (2006)003, Ensuring the existence of effective means at domestic level for the speedy execution of the European Court’s judgments. Avenues for reflection proposed by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the Court, 12 December 2006.

67GT-DH-PR A (2006)003, Ensuring the existence of effective means at domestic level for the speedy execution of the European Court’s judgments. Avenues for reflection proposed by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the Court, 12 December 2006.

68 CM/Rec (2008) 2, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the ECtHR, 6 February 2008, 3, 7.

69GT-DH-PR A (2006)003, Ensuring the existence of effective means at domestic level for the speedy execution of the European Court’s judgments. Avenues for reflection proposed by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the Court, 12 December 2006.

70 CM/Rec (2008) 2, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the ECtHR, 6 February 2008,9.

71 CM/Rec (2008) 2, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the ECtHR, 6 February 2008, 5.

72 CM/AS(2007)Rec1764 final, Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the PACE Recommendation 1764 (2006) on Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human, 30 March 2007, 1.

73 PACE Resolution 1516 (2006), Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 22.

74GT-DH-PR A (2006)003, Ensuring the existence of effective means at domestic level for the speedy execution of the European Court’s judgments. Avenues for reflection proposed by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the Court, 12 December 2006.

75 CM/Rec (2008) 2, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the ECtHR, 6 February 2008, 4, 6, 10.

76GT-DH-PR A (2006)003, Ensuring the existence of effective means at domestic level for the speedy execution of the European Court’s judgments. Avenues for reflection proposed by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the Court, 12 December 2006.

77 PACE Resolution 1226 (2000), Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 28 September 2000,10.

78CM Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 19 January 2000.

79В своей практике ЕСПЧ следующим образом определяет содержание принципа restitutio in integrum: «Постановление, в котором Суд указывает на нарушение, возлагает на государство-ответчика обязательство положить конец нарушению и компенсировать его последствия таким образом, чтобы ситуация, имевшая место до нарушения, была насколько это возможно восстановлена» (см, среди прочего, Papamichalopoulos case against Greece of 31 October 1995, paragraph 34, Series A 330-B).

80Explanatory memorandum to the CM Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 19 January 2000, 5-6.

81Explanatory memorandum to the CM Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 19 January 2000, 11.

82Статья 9 Конвенции гарантирует свободу мысли, совести и религии; статья 10 касается свободы выражения мнения.

83Explanatory memorandum to the CM Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 19 January 2000, 12.

84Explanatory memorandum to the CM Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 19 January 2000, 10.

85Explanatory memorandum to the CM Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 19 January 2000, 13.

86 О сложностях имплеметации данной Рекомендации в странах Совета Европы см. выше.

87CM/Inf/DH (2008)7 final, CM Memorandum on monitoring of the payment of sums awarded by way of just satisfaction: an overview of the Committee of Ministers’ present practice, 15 January 2009.

88Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 12 July 2000, 5.

89Explanatory memorandum to the PACE report on Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 18 September 2006, 102; Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 1^st Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2007, p.10.

90CM Recommendation on the publication and dissemination in the member States of the text of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, 18 December 2002.

91CM(2006)39 final, Report by the Ministers’ Deputies on Ensuring the continued effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights – The implementation of the reform measures, 12 May 2006.

92 CM Resolution Res (2002) 58 on the publication and dissemination of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, 18 December 2002.

93CM Recommendation Rec(2004)5 on the verification of the compatibility of draft laws, existing laws and administrative practice with the standards laid down in the European Convention on Human Rights, 12 May 2004.

94Appendix to CM Recommendation Rec(2004)5, 19-20.

95Appendix to CM Recommendation Rec(2004)5, 21-24.

96Appendix to CM Recommendation Rec(2004)5, 25-29.

97Appendix to СМ Recommendation Rec(2004)5, 12.

98AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 21.

99AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 8.

100AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 9.

101AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 10-11.

102 Stockholm Colloquy: Towards stronger implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level, Role of national parliaments in verifying state obligations to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights, including Strasbourg Court judgments: an overview, 9-10 June 2008, 9.

103 Stockholm Colloquy: Towards stronger implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level, Role of national parliaments in verifying state obligations to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights, including Strasbourg Court judgments: an overview, 9-10 June 2008, 11.

104AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 17.

105AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 14.

106AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 15.

107 СМ Recommendation Rec (2004) 4 on the European Convention on Human Rights in university educationand professional training, 12 May 2004.

108Appendix to Recommendation Rec(2004)4, 12 May 2004, 7.

109Appendix to Recommendation Rec(2004)4, 12 May 2004, 11-12.

110CM(2006)39 final, Report by the Ministers’ Deputies on Ensuring the continued effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights – The implementation of the reform measures, 12 May 2006.

111СМ Recommendation Rec (2004) 6 on improvement of domestic remedies, 12 May 2004.

112 Appendix to Recommendation Rec(2004)6, 12 May 2004, 20-23.

113 Appendix to Recommendation Rec(2004)6, 12 May 2004, 5.

114 Appendix to Recommendation Rec(2004)6, 12 May 2004, 9-10.

115 Appendix to Recommendation Rec(2004)6, 12 May 2004, 15-18.

116AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 24.

117AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 28.

118AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 38-39.

119AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 40-41.

120AS/Jur (2007) 35 rev 2, The effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights at national level. Working document, 26 July 2007, 51.

121Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2^nd Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2008, p.p. 8, 18.