Geum.ru

68557 зн

Вид материалаДокументы

Содержание


Список литературы
1   2   3   4   5

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
  1. Amsden A., J. Kochanowicz, L. Taylor. The Market Meets its Match. Restructuring the Economies of Eastern Europe. Cambridge, Mass.-L. 1994.
  2. Arrow K. J. Foreword / M. McFaul, T. Perlmutter (eds.), Privatization, Conversion, Enterprise Reform in Russia. Boulder/Col. 1995.
  3. Aslund A. Russia’s Road from Communism // Daedalus. 1992, V. 121, p. 77-95.
  4. Aslund A. How Russia Became a Market Economy. Wash., DC. 1995.
  5. Aslund A. Reform vs. 'Rent-Seeking' in Russia's Economic Transformation // Transition. 1996, V. 2(2), p.12-16.
  6. Aslund A. Why has Russia’s Economic Transformation so Arduous? Paper Prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Wash., DC. 1999. 28-30 April.
  7. Aslund A., P. Boone, S. Johnson. How to Stabilize: Lessons from Post-communist Countries / Brooking Papers on Economic Activity. 1996, No.1, p. 217-313.
  8. Beattie A. Strains in Bank's Inclusive Model // Financial Times. 2000, 16 June.
  9. Bence G., S. M. Lipset. Anticipations of the Failure of Communism // Theory and Society. 1994, V. 23.
  10. Bhagwati J. The Capital Myth // Foreign Affairs, 1998. 77(3).
  11. Bhagwati J. Growth is not a Passive 'Trickle-down' Strategy // Financial Times, 1999, 27 September.
  12. Bhagwati J. Sustained Growth Central in Fight Against Poverty // Financial Times.2000, 22 June.
  13. Blanchard O. et. al. Post-Communist Reform. Pain and Progress, Cambridge, Mass. 1993.
  14. Bönker F. The Political Economy of Fiscal Reform in Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA. 1999.
  15. Bönker F., K. Müller, A. Pickel (eds.). Postcommunist Transformation and the Social Sciences: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches. Boulder, CO. 2001.
  16. Bresser Pereira L.C. Economic Reform and Economic Growth: Efficiency and Politics in Latin America / idem, J.M. Maravall, A. Przeworski. Economic Reforms in New Democracies: A Social Democratic Approach. Cambridge, 1993, p. 15-76.
  17. Brus W. From Revisionism to Pragmatism. Sketches to a Self-Portrait of a ‘Reform Economist’ / J. M. Kovács, M. Tardos (eds.), Reform and Transition in Eastern Europe. L. 1992.
  18. Brus W., K. Laski. From Marx to the Market: Socialism in Search of an Economic System. Oxford. 1991.
  19. Bruszt L. Transformative Politics: Social Costs and Social Peace in East Central Europe // East European Politics and Societies. 1992, V.6, No. 1, p. 55-72.
  20. Burki J.,G. E. Perry. Beyond the Washington Consensus. Institutions Matter. Wash., DC. World Bank. 1998.
  21. Chavance B. The Transformation of the Communist System. Boulder, CO. 1994.
  22. Clague C., G.C. Rausser. The Emergence of Market Economies in Eastern Europe. Cambridge. 1992.
  23. Clarke S., J. Holmes. Poverty in Transition. Final Report. Warwick. 2000.
  24. Whence Reform? A Critique of the Stiglitz Perspective. CASE, Mimeo. Warsaw. 2000.
  25. De Melo M, C. Denizer, A. Gelb, S. Tenev. Circumstance and choice: The tale of initial conditions and policies in transition economies // World Bank Economic Review. 2001, V. 15 (1), p. 1-31.
  26. De Vries M. G. The IMF in a Changing World 1945-1985. Wash., DC: IMF. 1986
  27. Debreu G. Theory of Value. NY. 1959.
  28. Desai R., I. Goldberg. Stakeholders, Governance, and the Russian Enterprise Dilemma // Finance & Development. 2000, V.37 (2), p. 14-18.
  29. Diamond L. Is the Third Wave over? // Journal of Democracy. 1996, V. 7(3), p. 20-37.
  30. Dornbusch R. Weg mit sämtlichen Subventionen // Die Welt. 2000, 21 August.
  31. Eatwell J. International Capital Liberalisation. The Impact on World Development. New School of Social Research, CEPA-Working Paper No. 1, NY. 1996.
  32. Eatwell J. et. al. Transformation and Integration. Shaping the Future of Central and Eastern Europe. Southampton. 1995.
  33. Eatwell J., L. Taylor. Towards an Effective Regulation of International Capital Markets // Politics and Society. 1999, V. 27(3), p. 279-286.
  34. EBRD. Transition Report 1999. Ten Years of Transition. L.1999.
  35. Feldstein M. Refocusing the IMF // Foreign Affairs. 1998, V.77(2).
  36. Fischer S. Capital Account Liberalization and the Role of the IMF // IMF Survey. 1998. V. 26, № 19, p. 321–322.
  37. Fischer S., R. Sahay, C. A. Végh. Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: The Early Experience // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1996. V. 10(2), p. 45-66.
  38. Fischer S., R. Sahay. The Transition Economies After Ten Years. IMF, Working Paper WP/00/30, Wash., DC. 2000.
  39. Fleron F. J., E. P. Hoffmann. Post-Communist Studies and Political Science. Boulder, CO. 1993.
  40. Freeman J. R. Democracies and Markets. The Politics of Mixed Economies. Ithaca, NY. 1989.
  41. Fries S., M. Raiser, N. Stern. Macroeconomic and Financial Stability: Transition and East Europan ‘Contagion’ / ERBD, Working Paper No. 28, L. 1998.
  42. Fukuyama F. The Modernizing Imperative. The USSR as an Ordinary Country // The National Interest. Spring 1993, p. 10-18.
  43. Gibbon P. The World Bank and the New Politics of Aid // European Journal of Development Research. 1993, V. 5(1), p. 35-62.
  44. Giszpenc N., L. Squire. Global Development Network Helps Transform Economics in Transition Economies // Transition. 2000, V. 11(3-4), p. 16-18.
  45. Glasman M. The Great Deformation: Polanyi, Poland and the Terrors of Spontaneity / C. Bryant, E. Mockrzyki (eds.), The New Great Transformation? L., 1994, p. 191-217.
  46. Gould-Davies N., N. Woods. Russia and the IMF // International Affairs. 1999, V. 75(1), p. 1-22.
  47. Hahn F. The Relevance of General Equilibrium Theory for the Transformation of Centrally Planned Economics // Prague Economic Papers. 1992, V. 1(2), p. 99-108.
  48. Havryshylin O., J. Odling-Smee. Political Economy of Stalled Reforms // Finance & Development. 2000, V. 37(3), p. 7-10.
  49. Hellman J. Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions // World Politics. 1998, V. 50 (2), p. 203–34.
  50. Hewett E. A. Reforming the Soviet Economy. Equality versus Efficiency. Wash., DC. 1998.
  51. Hewett E. A. Is Soviet Socialism Reformable? / A. Dallin, G. W. Lapidus (eds.), The Soviet System. From Crisis to Collapse. Boulder, CO. 1989.
  52. Hirschman A. O. The Rise and Decline of Development Economics // idem, Essays in Trespassing. Cambridge. 1981.
  53. Hough J. F. Democratization and Revolution in the USSR 1985-1991. Wash., DC. 1997.
  54. Iglesias E. Call for ‘New Development Paradigm’ / UN, TAD/1907, 14 February. NY. 1997.
  55. IMF et. al. The Economy of the USSR. Summary and Recommendations. Wash., DC: World Bank. 1991.
  56. IMF. Good Governance. The IMF’s Role. Wash. DC: IMF. 1997.
  57. IMF. IMF Approach to Economic Stabilization: Does One Size Fit All? // IMF-Survey. 1998.V. 28(16), p.257-260.
  58. IMF. The Poverty and Growth Facility (PRGF), Operational Issues. Wash., DC: IMF. 1999.
  59. IMF. World Economic Outlook: May. Wash., DC. 2000.
  60. Intriligator M. Round Table on Russia: a New Policy for Russia // Economics of Transition/ 1997, V . 5(7), p. 225-227.
  61. Johnson C., E.B. Keehn. A Disaster in the Making // The National Interest. 1994. V. 36, Summer, p. 14-22.
  62. Karl T. L. Economic Inequality and Democratic Instability // Journal of Democracy. 2000, V.10(1), p. 449-456.
  63. Kirkpatrick J. J. Dictatorships and Double Standards. NY. 1981.
  64. Klaus V. So far, so Good // The Economist. 1994, 10 September, p. 33-35.
  65. Kołodko G. W. Transition to a Market Economy and Sustained Growth: Implications for the Post-Washington Consensus // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 1999, V. 27, p.233–61.
  66. Kornai J. Transformational Recession: the Main Causes // Journal of Comparative Economics. 1994, V. 19(1), p.39-63.
  67. Kornai J. Ten Years After ‘The Road to a Free Economy’. The Author’s Self-Evaluation. Paper for the World Bank ‘Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics 2000, Wash., DC. 2000.
  68. Kregel J. et.al. The Market Shock. An Agenda for the Economic and Social Reconstruction of Central and Eastern Europe. Vienna. 1992.
  69. Krugman P. Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, Mass. 1995.
  70. Krugman P. The Return of Depression Economics // Foreign Affairs. 1999, V. 78(1), p. 56-69.
  71. Laski K., A. Bhaduri. Lessons to be Drawn From Main Mistakes in the Transition Strategy / S. Zecchini (ed.), Lessons From the Economic Transition. Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s. Dordrecht, Boston, L.1997, p. 103-121.
  72. Lakatos I. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Cambridge. 1978.
  73. Linz J., A. Stepan. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore, MD. 1996.
  74. Lipton D., J. D. Sachs Privatization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1990, No. 2.
  75. Lipton D., J. D. Sachs. ”Prospects for Russia's Economic Reform,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1992, No.2, p. 213-284.
  76. Malia M. Leninist Endgame // Daedalus.1992, V. 121(1), p.57-75.
  77. Mouzelis N. Evolutionary Democracy: Talcott Parsons and the Collapse of Eastern European Regimes // Theory, Culture and Society. 1993, V.10(1), p. 145-152.
  78. Mueller K. From Post-Communism to Post-Modernity? Economy and Society in the Eastern European Transformations / B. Grancelli (ed.). Social Change and Modernization. Lessons from Eastern Europe. B.-NY. 1995.
  79. Müller K. (ed.) Postsozialistische Krisen. Opladen. 1998.
  80. Murrell P. Reform’s Rhetoric-Realization Relationship: The Experience of Mongolia / K. Poznanski (ed.). The Evolutionary Transition to Capitalism. Boulder, CO, San Francisco, Oxford, 1995, p. 79–96.
  81. Mussa M., M. A. Savastano. ”The IMF Approach to Economic Stabilization,” IMF Working Paper WP/99/104, Wash., DC. 1999.
  82. Naim M. Washington Consensus or Washington Confusion? // Foreign Policy. 2000, No.118, p. 86-103.
  83. Nellis J. Time to Rethink Privatization in Transition Economies? IFC, Discussion Paper No. 38, Wash., DC. 1999.
  84. Nuti D. M. Internal and International Aspects of Monetary Disequilibrium in Poland // European Economy. 1990, No. 43.
  85. OECD. Russian Federation. Economic Survey. P. 2000.
  86. OECD/DAC. Report on Development Co-operation. February 2000, P.: OECD. 2000.
  87. Pender J. From 'structural adjustment' to 'comprehensive development framework': conditionality transformed? // Third World Quarterly. 2001, V. 22 (3), p. 397-411.
  88. Pickel A. Neoliberalism, Gradualism, and Some Typical Ambiguities and Confusions in the Transformation Debate // New Political Economy. 1997, V. 2, No. 2, p.221-235.
  89. Pickel A. Official Ideology: The Role of Neoliberal Reform Doctrines in Postcommunist Transformation / A. Pickel, H. Wiesenthal (eds.), The Grand Experiment. Debating Shock Therapy, Transformation Theory, and the East German Experience. Boulder, CO. 1997, p. 212-228.
  90. Poznanski K. The Crisis of Transition as a State Crisis / F. Bönker, K. Müller, A. Pickel. Postcommunist Transformation and the Social Sciences: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches. Boulder, CO. 2001.
  91. Prebisch Lecture at UNCTAD, Geneva, October 19, 1998.
  92. Przeworski A. et. al. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge. 1995.
  93. Robinson A. US and EU differ on Priorities on EBRD // Financial Times. 1997, 16 April.
  94. Rodrik D. Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility? / S. Fischer et. al. (eds.), Should the IMF Pursue Capital-Account Convertibility? Princeton: Princeton University, Dept. of Economics. 1998.
  95. Rodrik D. Development Strategies for the Next Century. Paper presented at the conference on Developing Economies in the 21st. Century, Institute for Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization, January 26-27, 2000, in Chiba, Japan.
  96. Rodrik D. Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them // NBER, Working Paper No. 7540, Cambridge, Mass. 2000.
  97. Rosenbaum E. F., F. Bönker, H.-J. Wagener (eds.). Privatization, Corporate Governance and the Emergence of Markets. Basingstoke, L. 2000.
  98. Rutland P. Comparative Economics and the Study of Russia’s Regions / F. Bönker, K. Müller, A. Pickel (eds.), Postcommunist Transformation and the Social Sciences: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches. Boulder, CO, 2001, p. 111-128.
  99. Sachs J. Privatization in Top Priority in Eastern Europe // IMF Survey. 1991. V. 20 (11).
  100. Sachs J. Poland’s Jump to the Market Economy. Cambridge/Mass. 1994.
  101. Sachs J., Lipton, D. Poland´s Economic Reform // Foreign Affairs. 1990. V. 69(3), p. 47-65
  102. Sachs J. D., W. T. Woo. Structural Factors in the Economic Reforms of China, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union // Economic Policy. 1994, V. 18, p. 102–45.
  103. Sartori G. Rethinking Democracy: Bad Polity and Bad Politics // International Social Science Journal. 1991, V. 129, p. 437-450.
  104. Slay B. A Reply to Professor Stiglitz // PlanEcon. 2000, 16(7), p. 2-8.
  105. Smith G. B. Soviet Politics: Continuity and Contradiction. NY. 1998.
  106. Srinivasan T. N. Variety of Routes to Development Already Known // Financial Times. 1999, 28 September.
  107. Stallings B., W. Peres. Growth, Unemployment and Equity: The Impact of Economic Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Wash. DC. 2000.
  108. Standing G. Brave new words? A critique of Stiglitz’s World Bank Rethink // Development and Change. 2000, 31 (4), p. 737-763.
  109. Stiglitz J. E. Wither Socialism? Cambridge, Mass. 1994.
  110. Stiglitz J. E. More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Towards the Post-Washington Consensus. WIDER Annual Lecture No. 2, Helsinki. 1998.
  111. Stiglitz J. E. The Private Uses of Public Interest: Incentives and Institutions // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1998, 12 (2), p. 3–22.
  112. Stiglitz J. E. Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition. Paper Presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics. 1999, 28-29 April.
  113. Stiglitz J. Wither reform? // World Bank Economic Review. 2000, 14(1).
  114. Tanzi V. The Changing Role of the State in the Economy. A Historical Perspective. IMF, Working Paper No. 97/114, Wash., DC. 1997.
  115. The Economist. The Backlash in Latin America. 1996, 30 November, p. 23-26.
  116. Thornhill J. Russia’s Unique Economic Crisis May Have Led to 1998 Crisis // Financial Times, 2000, 22 February.
  117. Tiryakian E. Modernization in a Millenarian Decade / B. Grancelli (ed.). 1995, p. 249-264.
  118. UN/ECLAC. The Equity Gap. A Second Assessment. Santiago. 2000.
  119. Wade R. Showdown at the World Bank // New Left Review. 2001, 7 (Jan/Feb), p. 124-137.
  120. Waelboeck J. Half a Century of Development Economics // World Bank Economic Review. 1998, 12(2), p. 323-352.
  121. Wallerstein I. et. al. Open the Social Sciences. Report of the Gulbekian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford. 1996.
  122. Waterbury J. The Long Gestation and Brief Triumph of Import-Substituting Industrialization // World Development. 1999, 27(2), p. 323-341.
  123. Williamson J. What Washington Means by Policy Reform / J. Williamson (ed.). Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Wash., DC. 1990, p. 7-20.
  124. Williamson J. The Washington Consensus Revisited // L. Emmerij (ed.), Economic and Social Development into the XXI Century, Wash., DC. 1997.
  125. Williamson J. What Should the Bank Think About the Washington Consensus? Background to the World Bank's World Development Report 2000, Wash., DC: IIE. 1999.
  126. Wolfensohn J. D. A Proposal for a Comprehensive Development Framework, Mimeo, Wash., DC: World Bank. 1999.
  127. Wood B. Area Studies / International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 1968, V. 1, p. 401-407.
  128. World Bank. From Plan to Market. World Development Report. Oxford. 1996.
  129. World Bank. World Development Report 2000/1. Attacking Poverty. Wash., D.C.: World Bank. 2000.