Metaphor in its Broad Perspective
Информация - Иностранные языки
Другие материалы по предмету Иностранные языки
/p>
Conclusions
is very common in English and other languages. People often think of it as being a typical feature of poetry and literature. But, in fact, many familiar words and phrases have metaphorical meanings, although we do not usually realize this when we use them.idea of metaphor can be traced back to Aristotle who, in his Poetics (around 335 BC), defines metaphor as follows: Metaphor is the application of a strange term either transferred from the genus and applied to the species or from the species and applied to the genus, or from one species to another or else by analogy. Therefore, the key aspect of a metaphor is a specific transference of a word from one context into another. In this way it can be seen that any theme in literature is a metaphor, using the story to convey information about human perception of the theme in question.only one definition of metaphor cannot pe presented, as a great number of scientist study this phenomenon and each of them sees it from hie personal angle of vision. In this course paper the frequently used and well-known definitions are presented.has its types among them we can distinquish: common ( dead metaphor, extended metaphor (conceit), mixed metaphor, absolute metaphor) and uncommon (absolute or paralogical metaphor (sometimes called an anti-metaphor),an active metaphor, a complex metaphor, a compound or loose metaphor, a dying metaphor,a n epic metaphor or Homeric simile, an implicit metaphor, an implied or unstated metaphor, a simple or tight metaphor, a submerged metaphor and a synecdochic metaphor).terms metaphor and simile are slung around as if they meant exactly the same thing. A simile is a metaphor, but not all metaphors are similes.Metaphor is the broader term. In a literary sense metaphor is a rhetorical device that transfers the sense or aspects of one word to another. A metaphor carries so much more power than a simile, because its direct. Using like or as to make an open comparison will often diminish the vivid visual youre trying to paint in the readers mind. Likewise, a spot-on metaphor will spark instant understanding for a reader, without the elaboration that an analogy requires.These two notions are close but stll are not the same.common definition of a metaphor can be described as a comparison that shows how two things that are not alike in most ways are words in another important way. They explain how a metaphor is simply understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another. It means that a speaker can put ideas or objects into words or containers, and then send them along a channel, or conduit, to a listener who takes that idea or object out of the container and makes meaning of it. In other words, communication is something that ideas go into. The container is separate from the ideas themselves.Therefore metaphors are widely used in context to describe personal meaning. metaphorical word or phrase contains a key idea. This is the connection or wordsity between the literal meaning and the metaphorical meaning. Sometimes the same key idea is expressed in several different words and phrases. Metaphor is so common that it is sometimes almost impossible to talk about particular topics in English without using words that are metaphorical.Some basic metaphorical ideas are shared by many metaphors. The most important of these is the very general idea that abstract things are described as if they are concrete, or have a physical existence. For example, in English problems and difficulties are descrideb metaphorically as if they are illnesses or knots:
Transport was another headache for the government.is a really knotty problem [29;26].is impotant from the point of view of enriching the utterance and making it unique and easy to picture.Despite the fact that it is quite old device, it is frequenly used in the contemporary piece of writings.
List of References
1.Авеличев А.К. Заметки о метафоре // Вестник московского университета. - 1973. - №1. - 189 c.
2.Арнольд И.В. Стилистика современного английского языка. - Л.: Просвещение, 1973. - 304 c.
.Арутюнова Н.Д. Теория метафоры: Сборник.- М.: Прогресс, 1990. - 650 c.
4.Блэк М. Метафора // Теория метафоры. - М.: Прогресс, 1990. - 172 c.
.Брагина А.Л. Метафора - стандарт - штамп // Вестник МГУ - 1997 - №2. - 169 c.
6.Винарская Е.Н. Выразительные средства текста. - М.: Высшая школа,1989. - 236 c.
.Виноградов В.В. Проблемы русской стилистики. М., 1981.- 190 c.
.Вовк В.Н. Языковая метафора и художественной речи. М.: Просвещение, 1989. - 305 c.
.Гальперин И.Р. Стилистика английского языка. М.: Высшая школа, 1981. - 394 c.
10.Гальперин И.Р. Текст как субъект лингвистического исследования. - М.: Наука, 1981. - 99 c.
.Глазунова О.И. Логика метафорических преобразований. - Спб.: изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2000. - 200 c.
.Домашнев А.И. Шишкина И. П. Интерпретация художественного текста. М.: Просвещение, 1983. - 256 c .
13.Кожевникова Н.А. Метафора в поэтическом тексте // Метафора в языке и тексе. - М.: Наука, 1988. - 195 c.
.Кожин А.Н. Переносное употребление слова // РЯШ - 1954. - №3. - 38 c.
15.Кожинов В.В. Слово как форма образа // Сб. "Слово и образ", с.з. Просвещение М., 1964. - 181 c.
16.Крестинская Т.П. Изобразительные и выразительные средства языка // Как пользоваться словом. - Л.: Просвещение,1968. - 207 c.
.Скляревская Г.Н. Метафора в системе языка. - М.: Наука, 1993. - 85 c.
18.Blenkin, Geva M., Gwyn Edwards, and A. V. Kelly. 1992. Change and the curriculum. London: Paul Chapman. - 324 p.
19.Friedrich, Paul. 1991. Polytropy. In Beyond metaphor: the theory of tropes in anthropology, ed. Fernandez, James W. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, p.475.
20. Isherwood C., The Berlin Stories.1999. - 135 p.
. Koller, V. Critical discourse analysis and social cognition:
evidence from business media discourse anaphora: The need for synthesis.
Discourse and Society. 2005.- 224 p.
. Kvecses, Zoltn. 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. - 191 p.
. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What
categories reveal about the mind. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. - 456 p.
. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago;
London: University of Chicago Press, p.561.
25. Richards I. A. The Philosophy of Rhetoric, 1936. -106 p.
26. Russell Franklin. A Madness of Nature. 2001,- 98 p.
. Shakespeares Sonnets. Oxford Shakespeare Topics.Oxford press.
. - 100 p.
28. Steen, Gerard. 1999a. Metaphor and discourse: Towards a linguistic
checklist for metaphor analysis. InResearching and applying metaphor,
Lynne a Graham Low.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. - 239 p.
. Werth, Paul. 1999. Text worlds: representing conceptual space in
discourse:Textual explorations. Harlow:Longman. - 368 p.