
Adeyi O., Radulescu S., Huffman S., Vladu C., Florescu R. (1999).
Health sector reform in Romania: Balancing Needs, resources and values. // Eurohealth. Vol. 4 N.6 special Issue Winter 1998/1999, pp.
29Ц32.
Allen Schick. Agencies in Search of Principles. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2002.
Allen Schick. Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand Reforms. premdo clib.nsf/d7fa6241ab13b22e8525677e006cbe17/cd2875166aa40bcc525671300044cbcOpenDocument Andrews, Les. (1997). УThe Effect of HECS on Interest in Undertaking Higher Education.Ф Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division, Canberra, Australia.
Bar Mor H. (1996). The paradox of health care system in Izrael: the conflict between a "third party" government and an efficient mecha nism of carrying out public management". Presented paper on the 2nd ISTR Conference, Mexico City.
Barry Carin, David Good, Harry Kitchen and Harry Swain CEPRA Research Activities: In Support of the УConcept of Government Budget Expenditures PolicyФ, November 2002.
Camhi, Rosita, and Rosana Latuf. 2000. УEvaluacion del Sistema de Ayudas Estudiantiles a la Educacion Superior.Ф In Informe Social. Libertad y Desarrollo. Working Paper. Instituto Libertad y Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Comptroller and Auditor General. Improving Service Delivery: The Role of Executive Agencies. London: The Stationary Office, HC 525, Session 2002Ц03: 28 March 2003. publications/ nao_reports/02 03/0203525es.pdf David Marsden, Stephen French, and Katsuyuki Kubo, Does Performance Pay De Motivate, and Does it Matter (London: Centre for Economic Performance and Political Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2001). dp0503.pdf Denis Desautels, УAccountability for Alternative Service Delivery Arrangements in the Federal Government: Some Consequences of Sharing the Business of GovernmentФ. research/PAGE023.PDF Education at Glance, OECD, Ensor T. (1994). Reforming the health sector in former socialist countries of Europe, Presented paper on IRISS Congress, York, р.Ensor T., Thompson R. (1998) Health insurance as a catalist to change in former communist countries // Health policy, 1998, Vol. 43.
Evelyn L. Forget, Raisa Deber and Leslie L. Roos - Medical Savings Accounts: Will they reduce costs, 2002.
Goddard M., Mannion R. (1998). From competition to co operation:
new economic relationships in the National Health Service. // Health Economics, 1998,Vol. 7, pp. 105Ц119.
Goldstein E., Preker A., Adeyi O., Chellaraj G. (1996). Trends in health status, services, and finance. The transition in Central and Eastern Europe Vol.1 World Bank technical paper No. 341, 1996, р.19.
G.Williams. Current debates on funding of mass higher education in the United Kingdom // European journal of education. Oxford, 1998, Vol.33, N1. - P. 77Ц87.
Harding A., Preker A. /Ed. (2000). Innovations in health care delivery:
organizational reforms within the public sector. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Hospital Corporation International (1996). Restructuring the Singa pore general hospital. A brief explanation.
Joe, J., OТBrien, J., McIntry, E., Fortin, M. and Loudon, M. (2002).
Governance and Methods of Service Delivery for Water and Sewage Systems. Commissioned Paper 17, The Walkerton Inquiry. Toronto:
QueenТs Printer for Ontario.
Johnstone, D. Bruce, and Abebayehu Aemero. 2001. УThe Applicability for Developing Countries of Income Contingent Loans or Graduate Taxes, with special Consideration of an Australian HECS Type Income Contingent Loan Program for Ethiopia.Ф < buffalo.
edu/org/IntHigherEdFinance/textForSite/ApptoDevCountry.pdf;
Johnstone, Bruce. 2001. УThe Economics and Politics of Income Contingent Repayment Plans.Ф Buffalo, New York: State University of New York.
J Mayne; Eduardo Zapico Goс New Brunswick, Мониторинг эф i;
фективности в государственном секторе: будущие направления на основе международного опытаФ; NJ : Transaction Publishers, 1997.
Kalandadze T., Bregvadze I., Takaishvili, Archvadze, Moroshkina N.
(1999). Development of state health insurance system in Georgia. // Croatian Medical Journal, N. 40(2), pp. 216Ц220.
Levin, Henry M., and Hans G. Schь tze, eds. 1983. Financing Recur rent Education. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
Levin, Henry M. 2002. УPost Compulsory Entitlements: Vouchers for Life Long Learning.Ф Occasional Paper 46. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Lifelong Learning in the Global Knowledge Economy: Challenges for Developing Countries, World Bank, October, 2002.
L. Wagner. Dearing is dead - Dlunkett is born / Higher education quarterly, Oxford, 1998, Vol.52,N1. - P.64Ц76.
Markota M., Svab I., Klemencic K.S., Albreht T. (1999). Slovenian experience on health care reform. // Croatian Medical Journal, N. 40(2) pp. 190Ц194.
Marree J., Groenewegen P. (1997). Back to Bismark: Eastern European health care systems in Transition. Aldershot: Averbury, р.Marsden, French and Kubo, Does Performance Pay De Motivate Financial Incentives vs. Performance Appraisal, (London: Centre for Economic Performance and Political Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2000). pubs/download/ dp0476.pdf.
McMahon, Walter W. 1989. УPotential Resource Recovery in Higher Education in the Developing Countries and the Parents Expected Contribution.Ф Economics of Education Review, 7 (1) : 135Ц52.
Melissa Rode and Michael Rushton - Options for Raising Revenue for Health Care, Discussion Paper No. 9 for Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, 2002.
M.Trow. The Dearing Report: A transatlantic view // Higher education quarterly. Oxford,1998, Vol.52, N1, P. 93Ц117.
Nicholls, Jane. 1998. УStudent Financing in the Developing World:
Applying Income Contingent Approaches to Cost Recovery.Ф University of Melbourne, Australia. Mimeo.
OECD (1995b). New directions in health care policy. Health Policy Studies No. 7, Paris: OECD, р. 41.
Oosterbeek, Hessel. 1998. УInnovative Ways to Finance Education and Their Relation to Lifelong Learning.Ф Education Economics vol. 6 (3) :
219Ц251.
Peter Aucoin. УIndependent Foundations, Public Money and Public Accountability: Whither Ministerial Responsibility as Democratic GovernanceФ, The Journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada. Spring 2003, 46, 1, 1Ц26.
Richard Boyle; Donald Lemaire ; New Brunswick УBuilding effective evaluation capacity : lessons from practiceФ, N.J. : Transaction Publishers, 1999.
Robert G Evans - Options, Consequences, and Objections for Financing Health Care in Canada, 2002.
Robin Ford and David Zussman. Alternative Service Delivery:
Transcending Boundaries. (Toronto: KPMG and IPAC, 1997), 6.
Romanow and Beyond: A Primer on Health Reform Issues in Canada [ Cathy Fooks, Steven Lewis ], 2002.
Shape the Future of Health Care from the Commission on the Future of Health in Canada, Government of Canada, 2001Ц2002.
Sheils J, Hogan P. Cost of tax exempt health benefits in 1998.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999.
Simon Burgess and Paul Metcalfe, Incentive Pay for Teachers, Centre for Market and Public Organization, University of Bristol, June 1999, Issue 1.
Sriyan de Silva, An Introduction to Performance and Skill Based Pay Systems, (International Labour Organization, 1998). См.
aysy.htm.
The Spirit of Reform: Managing the New Zealand State Sector in a Time of Change, New Zealand: State Services Commission, August 1996.
The World Bank Group. Administrative and Civil Service Reform:
Alternative Service Delivery Mechanisms.
org/publicsector/civilservice/alternative.htm Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat, Framework for Alternative Program Delivery, 1995.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Policy on Alternative Service Delivery. See sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/opepubls_B4asd dmps1_e.asp Treasury Board of Canada, Alternative Service Delivery Policy Guide.
sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/opepubs/TB_B4pg gs/pg gs 1_e.asp Treasury Board of Canada. How to Guide for the Service Improve ment Initiative. sct.gc.ca/si si/sii ias/home_e.shtml The World Bank Group. УDifficulties with Autonomous AgenciesФ Vroom, V. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
WHO Regional Office for Europe health for all database.
World Bank, Two Generations of Performance. Evaluation and Man agement System in Australia, ECD Working Paper Series, aSearch/14163969A1A709BD85256E5100013AA8/$file/ecd_wp_11.pdf Electronic Data Sources:
Passport Canada. - The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation - www.minfin.ru UNDP documents/part_1.pdf Treasury Board of Canada Policy on Alternative Service Delivery. - sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/opepubls_B4asd dmps1_e.asp Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) - english/corpaffr/publications/prog/agence.shtml Canadian Tourism Commission, Who we are and what we do - Canadian Rural Partnership - e.phtml Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) -
cms.hhs.gov/default.asp City of Toronto, Alternative Service Delivery -
on.ca/asd/index.htm City of Toronto, Building Code Plan Reviews and Inspections - City of Toronto Forestry Field Services -
on.ca/asd/forestry.htm City of Toronto Purchasing Process -
on.ca/asd/purchasing.htm NAVCAN - Mathematica Policy Research Inc. - mpr.com/health.htm.
MyRichUncle, США - The Health Transition Fund - sc.gc.ca/htf fass/english/whatwedo_e.htm#Priority Annex 1:
The public interest test for alternative service delivery options The Public Interest Test (PIT)129 has been developed to identify:
Х the key policy issues that should be addressed at the various stages of the ASD process;
Х the key horizontal program and policy issues that should be consid ered when determining whether an ASD initiative is in the public interest; and Х the areas for which ASD proponents should develop results com mitments that will form the basis on which ASD initiatives will be monitored and evaluated.
The Public Interest Test is not a series of Yes or No questions. The overarching issue for decision makers, implementers and assessors of ASD initiatives is whether a proposed initiative in alternative service de livery is and remains in the public interest. By addressing the Public In terest Test questions the proponents will be able to determine whether their initiative will be in the public interest.
The Public Interest Test questions are used as a basis for making the Case Analysis for the ASD initiative. The Case Analysis sets out results commitments across a broad range of public policy requirements. The initiative will be assessed against these commitments, which will also be publicly reported.
Adapted from Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Policy on Alternative Service De livery. See sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/opepubls_B4asd dmps1_e.asp The Public Interest Test Questions The following are key issues in determining whether ASD initiatives are in the public interest.
Governance Х Does the new arrangement provide an appropriate decision making role for ministers Х Does the relationship with the proponent ensure appropriate links between policy and operations Х Are the arrangements appropriate for reporting results and other relevant performance information to ministers, Parliament, and citi zens Х Does the arrangement represent an appropriate balance between the flexibility required for high organizational performance and sound governance Official Language Requirements Х Have appropriate provisions been made for respecting the govern mentТs official languages.
Pages: | 1 | ... | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | ... | 56 |