Regions whose growth is based ondevelopment of the fuel sector (chiefly with a low level ofunemployment).

100,8%

13,2%

36,5%

Regions whose growthbased on factors other than development of the fuel sector (chiefly with a lowlevel of unemployment)

102,2%

12,1%

1,2%

Regions whose growth isbased on factors other than development of the fuel sector (chiefly with a highlevel of unemployment)

101,4%

18,4%

0,8%

Regions whose growthwas accompanied with a fall in the weight of the fuel sector

100,2%

16,0%

11,8%

Regions withunsustainable economic growth and production structure (chiefly with a lowlevel of unemployment)

98,8%

12,9%

12,1%

Regions with unsustainable economicgrowth and production structure (chiefly with a high level ofunemployment)

89,0%

31,1%

23,3%

Figure 3.3.1.

1 A detailed characteristic and an analysis of causes and specificsof interregional differences in living standards were presented, inter alia, inthe framework of CEPRA project УUroven zhizni i neravenstvo dokhodov votdelnykh regionakh. Razrabotka programm adresnoi sotsialnoi pomoschiФ (Livingstandards and the inequality of incomes in certain regions. Elaboration oftargeted social assistance programs).

2 The regions that reported occasional foreign investment inflowwith one asterisk, while those that showed occasional domestic investmentinflow- with two asterisks.

3 The regions that chiefly gravitate to the first group regardlessof huge foreign investment are marked with asterisk